Literature DB >> 25144807

Wound healing trajectories in burn patients and their impact on mortality.

Stephanie L Nitzschke1, James K Aden, Maria L Serio-Melvin, Sarah K Shingleton, Kevin K Chung, J A Waters, Booker T King, Christopher J Burns, Jonathan B Lundy, José Salinas, Steven E Wolf, Leopoldo C Cancio.   

Abstract

The rate of wound healing and its effect on mortality has not been well described. The objective of this article is to report wound healing trajectories in burn patients and analyze their effects on in-hospital mortality. The authors used software (WoundFlow) to depict burn wounds, surgical results, and healing progression at multiple time points throughout admission. Data for all patients admitted to the intensive care unit with ≥ 20% TBSA burned were collected retrospectively. The open wound size (OWS), which includes both unhealed burns and unhealed donor sites, was measured. We calculated the rate of wound closure (healing rate), which we defined as the change in OWS/time. We also determined the time delay (DAYS) from day of burn until day on which there was a reduction in OWS < 10%. Data are medians [interquartile range]. There were 38 patients with complete data; 25 had documentation of successful healing (H), and 13 did not (NH). H differed from NH on age (38 years [32-57] vs 63 [51-74]), body mass index (27 [21-28] vs 32 [19-52]), 24-hour fluid resuscitation (12 L [10-16] vs 18 [15-20]), pressors during first 48 hours (72% vs 100%), use of renal replacement therapy (32% vs 92%), and mortality (4% vs 100%). Repeated measures analysis of covariance showed a significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors on OWS as a function of time (P<.001). Patients with a positive healing rate (+2%/day) after postburn day 20 had 100% survival whereas those with a negative healing rate (-2%/day) had 100% mortality. For H patients, median DAYS was 41 (28-54); median DAYS/TBSA was 1.3 (1.0-1.9). Survivors had a 0.62% drop in OWS/day, or 4.3%/week. In this cohort of patients with ≥ 20% TBSA, there was a difference in mortality after postburn day 20, between patients with a positive healing rate (+2%/day, 100% survival) and those with a negative healing rate (-2%/day, 100% mortality, P < .05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25144807     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  10 in total

1.  Improved survival with an innovative approach to the treatment of severely burned patients: development of a burn treatment manual.

Authors:  S Morisada; N Nosaka; K Tsukahara; T Ugawa; K Sato; Y Ujike
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Wound healing in older adults with severe burns: Clinical treatment considerations and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen S Romanowski; Soman Sen
Journal:  Burns Open       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Evaluation of prognostic factors affecting lenght of stay in hospital and mortality rates in acute burn patients.

Authors:  M E AbdelWahab; M S Sadaka; E A Elbana; A A Hendy
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-06-30

4.  Two-Year Gender Differences in Satisfaction With Appearance After Burn Injury and Prediction of Five-Year Depression: A Latent Growth Curve Approach.

Authors:  Nour Al Ghriwati; Megan Sutter; Bradford S Pierce; Paul B Perrin; Shelley A Wiechman; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements.

Authors:  Matthew P Rowan; Leopoldo C Cancio; Eric A Elster; David M Burmeister; Lloyd F Rose; Shanmugasundaram Natesan; Rodney K Chan; Robert J Christy; Kevin K Chung
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  High-volume hemofiltration in adult burn patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kevin K Chung; Elsa C Coates; David J Smith; Rachel A Karlnoski; William L Hickerson; Angela L Arnold-Ross; Michael J Mosier; Marcia Halerz; Amy M Sprague; Robert F Mullins; Daniel M Caruso; Marlene Albrecht; Brett D Arnoldo; Agnes M Burris; Sandra L Taylor; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Early application of continuous high-volume haemofiltration can reduce sepsis and improve the prognosis of patients with severe burns.

Authors:  Bo You; Yu Long Zhang; Gao Xing Luo; Yong Ming Dang; Bei Jiang; Guang Tao Huang; Xin Zhu Liu; Zi Chen Yang; Yu Chen; Jing Chen; Zhi Qiang Yuan; Su Peng Yin; Yi Zhi Peng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Burn injury.

Authors:  Marc G Jeschke; Margriet E van Baar; Mashkoor A Choudhry; Kevin K Chung; Nicole S Gibran; Sarvesh Logsetty
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 52.329

9.  Evaluation of Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement Combined with Laser Doppler Imaging and Healing of Burn Wounds.

Authors:  Tomasz Korzeniowski; Jerzy Strużyna; Kamil Torres
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-08-03

10.  Autologous Graft Thickness Affects Scar Contraction and Quality in a Porcine Excisional Wound Model.

Authors:  Rodney K Chan; Lloyd F Rose; Jesse C Wu; David I Tucker; Maren M Chan; Robert J Christy; Robert G Hale; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.