| Literature DB >> 25144656 |
Margaret R Lentz1, Kristin L Peterson1, Wael G Ibrahim1, Dianne E Lee1, Joelle Sarlls2, Martin J Lizak3, Dragan Maric4, William C Reid1, Dima A Hammoud1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are currently no widely accepted neuro-HIV small animal models. We wanted to validate the HIV-1 Transgenic rat (Tg) as an appropriate neuro-HIV model and then establish in vivo imaging biomarkers of neuropathology, within this model, using MR structural and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25144656 PMCID: PMC4140825 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Coronal T1-weighted, directionally-encoded color FA map and T2-weighted MR images obtained from middle-aged transgenic rat (A) and age-matched control rat (B).
White arrows point to enlarged ventricular size in the Tg rat. The red contour delineates the ROI selected for measurement of DTI parameters in the CC.
Quantitative measurements of Neu-N counts and GFAP and NFH staining intensities in the young and middle-aged animals, in various locations.
| ROI | 3 month-old (n = 5) | 7 month-old (n = 3) | |
|
|
| 0.736±0.09 | 0.749±0.15 |
|
| 0.471±0.15 | 0.570±0.3 | |
|
|
| 0.374±0.18 | 0.318±0.13 |
|
| 0.445±0.15 | 0.223±0.13 | |
|
| 0.565±0.25 | 0.230±0.004 | |
|
|
| 0.874±0.11 | 0.934±0.04 |
|
| 0.671±0.26 | 0.935±0.29 | |
|
| 0.85±0.26 | 0.622±0.13 |
The numerical values represent the mean and standard deviations of staining count ratios (for Neu-N) and staining intensity ratios (for GFAP and NFH) of Tg/Control animals. Only animals stained in the same session were compared and used to obtain the ratios. Data was obtained from 8 young animals (5 Tg and 3 controls; 5 ratios) and 5 middle-aged animals (3 Tg and 2 controls; 3 ratios) except for NFH (*) where we had only two ratio values for the 7-month old group.
Figure 2Changes in (A) parenchymal volume and (B) ventricular volume, between the Tg rats and their age-matched controls at both young and middle-age.
Figure 3Changes in (A) CC fractional anisotropy and (B) CC mean diffusivity between the Tg rats and their age-matched controls at both young and middle-age.
Summary and Statistical Analysis of MR Measures in the Longitudinal Study.
| Measure | Tg rats | PairwiseT-test TgGroups ( | Control rats | Pairwise T-testControlGroups ( | ||
| 9–10month old | 15–16month old | 9–10monthold | 15–16 monthold | |||
|
| ||||||
| Total Brain (TBV) | 1918±64 | 1896±85 | N.S. | 2076±86 | 2118±25 | N.S. |
| Parenchyma (PV) | 1897±63 | 1871±85 | N.S. | 2058±87 | 2098±23 | N.S. |
| Ventricles (VV) | 21.2±6.8 | 25.3±8.6 |
| 18.7±1.0 | 19.9±1.6 | N.S. |
|
| ||||||
| Fractional Anisotropy (FA) | 0.38±0.03 | 0.40±0.01 | N.S. | 0.43±0.01 | 0.43±0.02 | N.S. |
| Mean Diffusivity (MD) | 0.86±0.03 | 0.80±0.04 |
| 0.80±0.06 | 0.81±0.01 | N.S. |
| Axial Diffusivity (AD) | 1.27±0.13 | 1.20±0.14 |
| 1.19±0.07 | 1.20±0.05 | N.S. |
| Radial Diffusivity (RD) | 0.70±0.06 | 0.65±0.06 |
| 0.61±0.05 | 0.60±0.04 | N.S. |
Values represent Average ± Standard Deviation of the 7 Tg and 3 control animals from the middle-age cohort that underwent repeated measures. MD, AD and RD units are×10−3 mm2/s. N.S. = Not significant.
Figure 4Immunofluorescence images from age-matched 3-month old Tg (A) and control (B) rats and from age-matched 7-month old Tg (C) and control (D) rats.
The captures were obtained from the central portion of the corpus callosum in each animal. Each row shows GFAP staining in yellow, NFH staining in Blue and a composite image of both (magnification 100X, scale bar = 40 µm). Subtle decreased GFAP and NFH staining are seen in the young Tg compared to the young control rat, however those differences become more noticeable in the 7-month old Tg compared to the age-matched control.