Literature DB >> 25143506

A comparison of concentric and eccentric glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Peter C Poon1, Justin Chou1, Simon W Young1, Tim Astley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inferior scapular notching following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is due to mechanical impingement and, in some studies, has been associated with poorer functional scores, lower patient satisfaction, and more limited shoulder motion. We aimed to test the hypothesis that inferior positioning of the center of rotation with eccentric glenosphere designs decreases the adduction deficit before impingement occurs and improves clinical outcome.
METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial was performed. According to the results of a power analysis, fifty patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy were randomized intraoperatively to receive either a concentric or eccentric glenosphere. The glenoid baseplate was positioned flush to the inferior border of the glenoid before the glenosphere was then attached. Notching was assessed using an anteroposterior radiograph, and clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analog pain scale score, shoulder function rating, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Oxford shoulder score. Active forward elevation and external rotation were assessed. The outcome assessor was blinded to the treatment group. The mean follow-up period for the groups was forty-three and forty-seven months.
RESULTS: Patient demographics and preoperative scores were similar between the groups. At the time of the final follow-up, four patients (14.8%) in the concentric group had developed inferior scapular notching (two with Nerot grade I and two with Nerot grade II), ranging in size from 1.1 to 7.4 mm, compared with one patient (4.3%; Nerot grade I) in the eccentric group (p = 0.36). No notching occurred in any patient with glenoid overhang of >3.5 mm. No significant difference between the groups was seen with respect to functional outcome scores, patient satisfaction, or shoulder motion.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in notching rates or clinical outcomes between concentric and eccentric glenospheres following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Inferior glenosphere overhang of >3.5 mm, however, prevented notching. This may be achieved with a modified surgical technique, but eccentric glenospheres provide an additional option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25143506     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  13 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Manuel Urvoy; Patric Raiss; Jean-David Werthel; Doruk Akgün; Jean Chaoui; Paul Siegert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Early clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric all-polyethylene glenosphere to treat failed hemiarthroplasty and the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Antonio Tartarone; John W Sperling; Paolo Paladini; Elisabetta Fabbri; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Richard S Craig; Henry Goodier; Jasvinder A Singh; Sally Hopewell; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 6.  Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Minoo Patel; David Knox
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results according to Glenosphere Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Short-term Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Chang Hyuk Choi; Sung Guk Kim; Jae Jun Lee; Byung Hoon Kwack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

Review 8.  A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Alexander Van Tongel; Lieven De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 10.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.