Literature DB >> 25143493

The effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Patrick J Cahill1, Joshua M Pahys1, Jahangir Asghar2, Burt Yaszay3, Michelle C Marks4, Tracey P Bastrom3, Baron S Lonner5, Suken A Shah6, Harry L Shufflebarger2, Peter O Newton3, Randal R Betz1, Amer F Samdani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-surgeon series investigating the learning curve involved in surgery for spinal deformity may be confounded by changes in technology and techniques. Our objective with this multicenter, prospective study was to present a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of surgeon experience on surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: All posterior-only surgical procedures for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis performed in the 2007 to 2008 academic year, with a minimum of two years of patient follow-up, were included. Two groups were created on the basis of surgeon experience: a young surgeons' group, which included patients of surgeons with less than five years of experience, and an experienced surgeons' group, which included patients of surgeons with five or more years of experience.
RESULTS: Nine surgeons (four young and five experienced) operated on a total of one hundred and sixty-five patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The surgeons' experience ranged from less than one year to thirty-six years in practice. The two groups had similar preoperative curve-magnitude measurements, SRS-22 (Scoliosis Research Society-22) scores, and distribution by Lenke curve type. There were significant operative and postoperative differences. The young surgeons fused an average of 1.2 levels more than the experienced surgeons (p = 0.045). The mean intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) of the young surgeons' group was more than twice that of the experienced surgeons' group (2042 mL compared with 1013 mL; p < 0.001). The duration of surgery was 458 minutes for the young surgeons compared with 265 minutes for the experienced surgeons (p < 0.001). The overall SRS-22 scores were significantly worse in the young surgeons' group (a mean of 4.1 compared with 4.5; p = 0.001). The difference between groups was also significant for the domains of pain (p = 0.016), self-image (p = 0.008), and function (p < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative results and health-related quality of life following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were significantly and positively correlated with surgeon experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25143493     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  16 in total

1.  Influence of curve magnitude and other variables on operative time, blood loss and transfusion requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Nugent; R C Tarrant; J M Queally; P Sheeran; D P Moore; P J Kiely
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Single vs two attending senior surgeons: assessment of intra-operative blood loss at different surgical stages of posterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Guideline for practical application].

Authors:  J Seifert; F Thielemann; P Bernstein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Development of a preoperative risk score predicting allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in children undergoing spinal fusion.

Authors:  Lisa Eisler; Stanford Chihuri; Lawrence G Lenke; Lena S Sun; David Faraoni; Guohua Li
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Expertise of Surgeons Publishing Novel Techniques in the Journal of Wrist Surgery.

Authors:  Lara L Cohen; Dustin H Massel; Joseph S Geller; David L Chen; Seth D Dodds
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

7.  Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive scoliosis surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective case series of 84 patients.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang; Seung Woo Suh; Neelesh Damani; Hoon-Nyun Lee; Jungwook Lim; Frederick Mun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Does intraoperative CT navigation increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keith D Baldwin; Manasa Kadiyala; Divya Talwar; Wudbhav N Sankar; John Jack M Flynn; Jason B Anari
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Factors Impacting Recurrence Rate After Open Ganglion Cyst Excision.

Authors:  Landon M Cluts; John R Fowler
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-05-26

10.  A National Comparison of Operative Outcomes of New and Experienced Surgeons.

Authors:  Rachel R Kelz; Morgan M Sellers; Bijan A Niknam; James E Sharpe; Paul R Rosenbaum; Alexander S Hill; Hong Zhou; Lauren L Hochman; Karl Y Bilimoria; Kamal Itani; Patrick S Romano; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.