Literature DB >> 25142925

Comparison of thermodilution, lithium dilution, and pulse contour analysis for the measurement of cardiac output in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs.

Juan Morgaz1, María Del Mar Granados, Pilar Muñoz-Rascón, Juan Manuel Dominguez, Jose Andrés Fernández-Sarmiento, Rafael J Gómez-Villamandos, Rocío Navarrete.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To (1) evaluate lithium dilution (LiDCO) and transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCOTD ) in relation to traditional thermodilution (PAC-TD) for determining cardiac output (CO) in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs and to (2) compare the continuous CO values obtained using power analysis (PulseCO) with continuous PiCCO (PiCCOc).
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study.
SETTING: University research laboratory. ANIMALS: Fourteen healthy Beagles.
INTERVENTIONS: CO was measured using PAC-TD, LiDCO, and PiCCOTD in 3 different hemodynamic states induced in random order and defined on the basis of the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Normodynamic state was defined as the baseline MAP and 1 MAC sevoflurane. The hypodynamic state was induced with a deep level of sevoflurane anesthesia. The hyperdynamic state was induced with noradrenaline. After these measurements were obtained in each hemodynamic state, CO was monitored continuously for 30 min using PulseCO and PiCCOc. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients, and a trend score was determined for the continuous CO measurements.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was good agreement among the 3 modalities of CO measurement in each hemodynamic state. The mean CIPAC-TD /CIPICCOTD bias was -0.04 ± 1.19 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -2.37/1.93 L/min/m(2) ), and the mean CIPAC-TD /CILiDCO bias was -0.11 ± 1.55 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -3.04/2.93 L/min/m(2) ). The mean CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc bias was -0.04 ± 1.91 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -1.95/1.87 L/min/m(2) ), which suggested good agreement. The CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc trend score, calculated from 252 paired comparisons, was 93.3% positive after zone exclusion (∆CI < 15%).
CONCLUSIONS: Both LiDCO and PiCCOTD agreed well with PAC-TD for the measurement of CO under different hemodynamic conditions. Moreover, PiCCOc appears to be an accurate method for monitoring continuous CO in dogs as its performance for measurement was similar to that of PulseCO. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LiDCO; PiCCO; dogs; hemodynamic monitoring; thermodilution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142925     DOI: 10.1111/vec.12219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)        ISSN: 1476-4431


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs.

Authors:  N A Garofalo; F J Teixeira-Neto; J C Rodrigues; S A Cerejo; A J A Aguiar; D R Becerra-Velásquez
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised dogs: a comparison with the thermodilution technique.

Authors:  Matheus M Mantovani; Denise T Fantoni; André M Gimenes; Jacqueline R de Castro; Patrícia B Flor; Keila K Ida; Denise S Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.