| Literature DB >> 25142923 |
Alice Talpin, Félicie Costantino, Nelly Bonilla, Ariane Leboime, Franck Letourneur, Sébastien Jacques, Florent Dumont, Sonia Amraoui, Charles-Antoine Dutertre, Henri-Jean Garchon, Maxime Breban, Gilles Chiocchia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the functional capacity and gene expression profile of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MD-DCs) in HLA-B27+ axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients and healthy controls.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25142923 PMCID: PMC4292999 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-014-0417-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Figure 1Impaired allogeneic T cell stimulatory capacity of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MD-DCs) from spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. MD-DCs from SpA patients and healthy controls that were left unstimulated at baseline (H0), or were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 6 h or 24 h (H6 and H24, respectively) were tested for their capacity to stimulate in vitro allogeneic CD4+ T cells. Results are expressed as 3H-deoxythymidine incorporation after 6 days of mixed lymphocyte reaction, in counts per minute (CPM) ratio. Bars represent the mean proliferation index and standard error of the mean induced by MD-DCs from 19 SpA patients and 24 healthy controls. The Wilcoxon test showed significant differences at H0 (*P <0.05) and H6 (**P <0.01). MLR, mixed lymphocyte reaction.
Figure 2Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 57 samples based on microarray expression levels of the 81 differentially expressed genes between spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients and controls. Each time point is color-coded (baseline (H0): blue, 6 h (H6): red, 24 h (H24): green). Samples are clustered on the horizontal axis (top row: SpA patients, bottom row: healthy controls), with the length on the vertical axis representing the degree of correlation between samples.
qRT-PCR expression analysis of four selected genes in monocyte-derived dendritic cells from spondyloarthritis patients, as compared to controls
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0.0003 |
|
| 2.2 |
| 2.2 |
|
| 0.0007 | 0.21 |
| 0.94 |
| 0.99 |
|
| 0.00006 |
|
| 1.32 | 1.25 |
|
|
| 0.006 |
| 0.8 |
|
| 2.97 |
P-value is reported considering the global effect, the effect of the disease status only or the effect of the disease status adjusted for time. Bold text indicates significant P-values and at what time the modulation of gene expression was significantly different between patients and controls.
Figure 3Scatter plots showing qRT-PCR expression levels in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and controls of the 4 selected genes: (A), (B), (C) and (D). The x-axis of the plots represents the three lipopolysaccharide-stimulation time points (baseline (H0), 6 h (H6) and 24 h (H24)) and the y-axis shows the log2 of gene expression level normalized with housekeeping genes (∆∆Ct). *P <0.05, ***P <0.0005, for SpA versus controls.
Figure 4Correlation of qRT-PCR expression levels between and Expression is shown for H6 time-point in mixed spondyloarthritis (open circles) and control (black triangles) samples. P-value (P) and nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient value (rho) are shown.
Figure 5Co-expression of the Wnt signaling pathway with in spondyloarthritis (SpA). Graphical view of the Wnt pathway identified by studying genes co-expressed at 6 h (H6) with CITED2 in the whole microarray dataset in patients (A) and in controls (B). Numbers and color code (scale on the right side) indicate nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient of the network's gene with CITED2.