Literature DB >> 25142705

Length of home hospice care, family-perceived timing of referrals, perceived quality of care, and quality of death and dying in terminally ill cancer patients who died at home.

Akemi Yamagishi1, Tatsuya Morita, Shohei Kawagoe, Megumi Shimizu, Taketoshi Ozawa, Emi An, Makoto Kobayakawa, Satoru Tsuneto, Yasuo Shima, Mitsunori Miyashita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to clarify the length of home hospice care, family-perceived timing of referrals, and their effects on the family-perceived quality of care and quality of death and dying of terminally ill cancer patients who died at home and identify the determinants of perceived late referrals.
METHODS: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted involving 1,052 family members of cancer patients who died at home supported by 15 home-based hospice services throughout Japan.
RESULTS: A total of 693 responses were analyzed (effective response rate, 66 %). Patients received home-based hospice care for a median of 35.0 days, and 8.0 % received home hospice care for less than 1 week. While 1.5 % of the families reported the timing of referrals as early, 42 % reported the timing as late or too late. The families of patients with a length of care of less than 4 weeks were more likely to regard the timing of referrals as late or too late. The patients of family members who regarded the timing of referrals as late or too late had a significantly lower perceived quality of care (effect size, 0.18; P = 0.039) and lower quality of death and dying (effect size, 0.15, P = 0.063). Independent determinants of higher likelihoods of perceived late referrals included: frequent visits to emergency departments, patient being unprepared for worsening condition, and patient having concerns about relationship with new doctor. Discharge nurse availability was independently associated with lower likelihoods of perceived late referrals.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of bereaved families regarded the timing of referrals to home hospices as late, and the perceived timing was associated with the family-perceived quality of care and quality of death and dying. Systematic strategies to overcome the barriers related to perceived late referrals are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142705     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2397-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  5 in total

1.  Is Care for the Dying Improving in the United States?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Pedro Gozalo; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Are Trends in Hospitalization Prior to Hospice Use Associated With Hospice Episode Characteristics?

Authors:  Brystana G Kaufman; Carla A Sueta; Cathy Chen; B Gwen Windham; Sally C Stearns
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Family Perspectives on Hospice Care Experiences of Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Pallavi Kumar; Alexi A Wright; Laura A Hatfield; Jennifer S Temel; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberta I Jordan; Matthew J Allsop; Yousuf ElMokhallalati; Catriona E Jackson; Helen L Edwards; Emma J Chapman; Luc Deliens; Michael I Bennett
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Effect of hospice care on quality indicators of end-of-life care among patients with liver cancer: a national longitudinal population-based study in Taiwan 2000-2011.

Authors:  Yee-Hsin Kao; Jui-Kun Chiang
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.