Literature DB >> 25142183

Determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban by ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and coagulation assays for therapy monitoring of novel direct oral anticoagulants.

E M H Schmitz1, K Boonen, D J A van den Heuvel, J L J van Dongen, M W M Schellings, J M A Emmen, F van der Graaf, L Brunsveld, D van de Kerkhof.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently been registered by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency Commission: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. To quantify DOACs in plasma, various dedicated coagulation assays have been developed.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a reference ultra-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method and to evaluate the analytical performance of several coagulation assays for quantification of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
METHODS: The developed UPLC-MS/MS method was validated by determination of precision, accuracy, specificity, matrix effects, lower limits of detection, carry-over, recovery, stability, and robustness. The following coagulation assays were evaluated for accuracy and precision: laboratory-developed (LD) diluted thrombin time (dTT), Hemoclot dTT, Pefakit PiCT, ECA, Liquid anti-Xa, Biophen Heparin (LRT), and Biophen DiXal anti-Xa. Agreement between the various coagulation assays and UPLC-MS/MS was determined with random samples from patients using dabigatran or rivaroxaban.
RESULTS: The UPLC-MS/MS method was shown to be accurate, precise, sensitive, stable, and robust. The dabigatran coagulation assay showing the best precision, accuracy and agreement with the UPLC-MS/MS method was the LD dTT test. For rivaroxaban, the anti-factor Xa assays were superior to the PiCT-Xa assay with regard to precision, accuracy, and agreement with the reference method. For apixaban, the Liquid anti-Xa assay was superior to the PiCT-Xa assay.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the various coagulation assays as compared with the UPLC-MS/MS reference method. It is currently unknown whether these differences are clinically relevant. When DOACs are quantified with coagulation assays, comparison with a reference method as part of proficiency testing is therefore pivotal.
© 2014 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apixaban; dabigatran; drug monitoring; mass spectrometry; rivaroxaban

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142183     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  27 in total

Review 1.  Reversal Strategies for NOACs: State of Development, Possible Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Steen Husted; Freek W A Verheugt; Willemijn J Comuth
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Monitoring of low dabigatran concentrations: diagnostic performance at clinically relevant decision thresholds.

Authors:  Florian Härtig; Sven Poli; Matthias Ebner; Ingvild Birschmann; Joachim Kuhn; Ulf Ziemann; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Rainer Lehmann; Andreas Peter; Sebastian Hörber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  [New oral anticoagulants for prophylaxis of stroke. Results of an expert conference on practical use in geriatric patients].

Authors:  Philipp Bahrmann; Fred Harms; Christian Martin Schambeck; Martin Wehling; Jürgen Flohr
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Effect of Activated Charcoal on Rivaroxaban Complex Absorption.

Authors:  Edouard Ollier; Sophie Hodin; Julien Lanoiselée; Jean Escal; Sandrine Accassat; Elodie De Magalhaes; Thierry Basset; Laurent Bertoletti; Patrick Mismetti; Xavier Delavenne
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  [Anticoagulation in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation : With what and for whom no more?]

Authors:  P Bahrmann; M Christ
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Determination of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban in rat plasma by UPLC-MS/MS method.

Authors:  Wan-Li Zhang; Dan Lou; Dong-Tao Zhang; Yin Zhang; Huan-Jie Huang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Determination of the cut-off prothrombin time to estimate plasma rivaroxaban overdose status.

Authors:  Bohyun Kim; Seongsoo Jang; Yu-Jin Lee; Nuree Park; Young-Uk Cho; Chan-Jeoung Park
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Laboratory measurement of apixaban using anti-factor Xa assays in acute ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hyoshim Shin; Min-Chul Cho; Rock Bum Kim; Chang-Hun Kim; Nack-Cheon Choi; Soo-Kyung Kim; Eun-Ha Koh
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Detecting direct oral anticoagulants in trauma patients using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: A novel approach to medication reconciliation.

Authors:  Sudha Jayaraman; Jonathan H DeAntonio; Stefan W Leichtle; Jinfeng Han; Loren Liebrecht; Daniel Contaifer; Caroline Young; Christopher Chou; Julia Staschen; David Doan; Naren Gajenthra Kumar; Luke Wolfe; Tammy Nguyen; Gregory Chenault; Rahul J Anand; Jonathan D Bennett; Paula Ferrada; Stephanie Goldberg; Levi D Procter; Edgar B Rodas; Alan P Rossi; James F Whelan; Ventaka Ramana Feeser; Michael J Vitto; Beth Broering; Sarah Hobgood; Martin Mangino; Michel Aboutanos; Lorin Bachmann; Dayanjan S Wijesinghe
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.697

10.  Accidental Thrombolysis in a Stroke Patient Receiving Apixaban.

Authors:  Felix Fluri; Michael Fleischer; Christoph Kleinschnitz
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2015-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.