Ingo Slottosch1, Oliver Liakopoulos2, Elmar Kuhn3, Antje Deppe3, Alberto Lopez-Pastorini3, David Schwarz3, Klaus Neef3, Yeong-Hoon Choi3, Anja Sterner-Kock, Kristina Jung4, Christian Mühlfeld5, Thorsten Wahlers3. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heartcenter, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany ingo.slottosch@uk-koeln.de. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heartcenter, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany Department Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heartcenter, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 4. Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. 5. Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury of the lungs contributes to pulmonary dysfunction after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), leading to increased morbidity and mortality of patients. This study investigated the value of controlled lung reperfusion strategies on lung ischaemia-reperfusion injury in a porcine CPB model. METHODS: Pigs were subjected to routine CPB for 120 min with 60 min of blood cardioplegic cardiac arrest (CCA). Following CCA, the uncontrolled reperfusion (UR, n = 6) group was conventionally weaned from CPB. Two groups underwent controlled lung reperfusion strategies (CR group: controlled reperfusion conditions, n = 6; MR group: controlled reperfusion conditions and modified reperfusate, n = 6) via the pulmonary artery before CPB weaning. Sham-operated pigs (n = 7) served as controls. Animals were followed up until 4 h after CPB. Pulmonary function, haemodynamics, markers of inflammation, endothelial injury and oxidative stress as well as morphological lung alterations were analysed. RESULTS: CPB (UR group) induced deterioration of pulmonary function (lung mechanics, oxygenation index and lung oedema). Also, controlled lung reperfusion groups (CR and MR) presented with pulmonary dysfunction after CPB. However, compared with UR, controlled lung reperfusion strategies (CR and MR) improved lung mechanics and reduced markers of oxidative stress, but without alteration of haemodynamics, oxygenation, inflammation, endothelial injury and lung morphology. Both controlled reperfusion groups were similar without relevant differences. CONCLUSION: Controlled lung reperfusion strategies attenuated a decrease in lung mechanics and an increase in oxidative stress, indicating an influence on CPB-related pulmonary injury. However, they failed to avoid completely CPB-related lung injury, implying the need for additional strategies given the multifactorial pathophysiology of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES:Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury of the lungs contributes to pulmonary dysfunction after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), leading to increased morbidity and mortality of patients. This study investigated the value of controlled lung reperfusion strategies on lung ischaemia-reperfusion injury in a porcine CPB model. METHODS:Pigs were subjected to routine CPB for 120 min with 60 min of blood cardioplegic cardiac arrest (CCA). Following CCA, the uncontrolled reperfusion (UR, n = 6) group was conventionally weaned from CPB. Two groups underwent controlled lung reperfusion strategies (CR group: controlled reperfusion conditions, n = 6; MR group: controlled reperfusion conditions and modified reperfusate, n = 6) via the pulmonary artery before CPB weaning. Sham-operated pigs (n = 7) served as controls. Animals were followed up until 4 h after CPB. Pulmonary function, haemodynamics, markers of inflammation, endothelial injury and oxidative stress as well as morphological lung alterations were analysed. RESULTS: CPB (UR group) induced deterioration of pulmonary function (lung mechanics, oxygenation index and lung oedema). Also, controlled lung reperfusion groups (CR and MR) presented with pulmonary dysfunction after CPB. However, compared with UR, controlled lung reperfusion strategies (CR and MR) improved lung mechanics and reduced markers of oxidative stress, but without alteration of haemodynamics, oxygenation, inflammation, endothelial injury and lung morphology. Both controlled reperfusion groups were similar without relevant differences. CONCLUSION: Controlled lung reperfusion strategies attenuated a decrease in lung mechanics and an increase in oxidative stress, indicating an influence on CPB-related pulmonary injury. However, they failed to avoid completely CPB-related lung injury, implying the need for additional strategies given the multifactorial pathophysiology of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction.