Literature DB >> 25141991

The influence of visual impairment on pregnancy outcomes.

Danielle Ofir1, Roy Kessous, Nadav Belfer, Tova Lifshitz, Eyal Sheiner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether visually impaired women are at higher risk for adverse maternal and perinatal complications, with an emphasis on visual impairment due to autoimmune etiology.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared obstetric, delivery complications and perinatal outcomes of patients with and without a diagnosis of visual impairment in one or both eyes. Multivariable models were conducted to control for confounders.
RESULTS: During the study period (1988-2012), 265,741 deliveries were included; of these 80 (0.03%) occurred in visually impaired patients. These patients were significantly older than the comparison group, and had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and severe preeclampsia. Visually impaired women had higher rates of delivery prior to 37 weeks gestation and significantly higher rate of delivery by cesarean section (CS). A multivariable analysis model demonstrated that the risk factor for CS and packed cell transfusion in visually impaired women remained significantly high even after controlling for confounders such as maternal age, ethnicity, etc. (weighted OR = 2.04; 95% CI 1.23-3.37; p = 0.006). However, visual impairment was not an independent risk factor for congenital malformations, using another multivariable model (weighted OR = 1.96; 95% CI 0.99-3.85; p = 0.051). Perinatal outcome was comparable between the groups. The sub-group of visually impaired women due to possible autoimmune etiology was 19.4% and they had higher rates of recurrent miscarriages and CS compared to the other sub-groups.
CONCLUSION: Visually impaired pregnant women are at high risk for CS and packed cell transfusion. Nevertheless, perinatal outcome is comparable to the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25141991     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3412-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Maternal disability and risk for pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lesley A Tarasoff; Saranyah Ravindran; Hannan Malik; Dinara Salaeva; Hilary K Brown
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Severe maternal morbidity and other perinatal complications among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Willi Horner-Johnson; Bharti Garg; Blair G Darney; Frances M Biel; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.103

Review 3.  Health of Newborns and Infants Born to Women With Disabilities: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lesley A Tarasoff; Fahmeeda Murtaza; Adele Carty; Dinara Salaeva; Angela D Hamilton; Hilary K Brown
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Pregnancy outcomes among visually impaired women in Washington State, 1987-2014.

Authors:  Melissa A Schiff; David R Doody; Deborah A Crane; Beth A Mueller
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Refractive error and its associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care unit at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mengistie Diress; Yigizie Yeshaw; Minychil Bantihun; Baye Dagnew; Adugnaw Ambelu; Mohammed Abdu Seid; Yonas Akalu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of women with disabilities: a nationwide population-based study in South Korea.

Authors:  Jae Eun Shin; Geum Joon Cho; Seongeun Bak; Sang Eun Won; Sung Won Han; Soo Bin Lee; Min-Jeong Oh; Sa Jin Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.