Literature DB >> 2514064

The Rh-negative donor.

M Contreras1, R C Knight.   

Abstract

By typing fully for Rh, donor samples found to be D-negative but C-positive and/or E-positive on the Kontron Groupamatic G2000, the incidence of Ccddee (r'r) was found to be 0.44%, ccddEe (r"r) 0.50% and Du 0.30%. A total of 15,000 samples typed on the Groupamatic as D-, C- and E-negative were tested by an antiglobulin technique for Du, but none was found to be positive. A new strategy was therefore adopted for routine Rh typing of donations that includes typing first-time donors on the Groupamatic for C, D and E antigens; those that type as D-negative, C-positive and/or E-positive are further tested but no routine Du testing of D-, C- and E-negative donations is performed. Donations are labelled according to their D type, and the once used terminology 'Rh-positive donor, Rh-negative recipient' is no longer used except for those rare Rh D-positive donors belonging to the D category VI of Tippett & Sanger (1962).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2514064     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1989.tb00229.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol        ISSN: 0141-9854


  2 in total

Review 1.  Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.

Authors:  S Gerald Sandler; Leonard N Chen; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Difficulties in Immunohaematology : The Weak D Antigen.

Authors:  H Kumar; D K Mishra; R S Sarkar; M Jaiprakash
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.