Literature DB >> 25140387

Mixtures as a fungicide resistance management tactic.

Frank van den Bosch, Neil Paveley, Femke van den Berg, Peter Hobbelen, Richard Oliver.   

Abstract

We have reviewed the experimental and modeling evidence on the use of mixtures of fungicides of differing modes of action as a resistance management tactic. The evidence supports the following conclusions. 1. Adding a mixing partner to a fungicide that is at-risk of resistance (without lowering the dose of the at-risk fungicide) reduces the rate of selection for fungicide resistance. This holds for the use of mixing partner fungicides that have either multi-site or single-site modes of action. The resulting predicted increase in the effective life of the at-risk fungicide can be large enough to be of practical relevance. The more effective the mixing partner (due to inherent activity and/or dose), the larger the reduction in selection and the larger the increase in effective life of the at-risk fungicide. 2. Adding a mixing partner while lowering the dose of the at-risk fungicide reduces the selection for fungicide resistance, without compromising effective disease control. The very few studies existing suggest that the reduction in selection is more sensitive to lowering the dose of the at-risk fungicide than to increasing the dose of the mixing partner. 3. Although there are very few studies, the existing evidence suggests that mixing two at-risk fungicides is also a useful resistance management tactic. The aspects that have received too little attention to draw generic conclusions about the effectiveness of fungicide mixtures as resistance management strategies are as follows: (i) the relative effect of the dose of the two mixing partners on selection for fungicide resistance, (ii) the effect of mixing on the effective life of a fungicide (the time from introduction of the fungicide mode of action to the time point where the fungicide can no longer maintain effective disease control), (iii) polygenically determined resistance, (iv) mixtures of two at-risk fungicides, (v) the emergence phase of resistance evolution and the effects of mixtures during this phase, and (vi) monocyclic diseases and nonfoliar diseases. The lack of studies on these aspects of mixture use of fungicides should be a warning against overinterpreting the findings in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25140387     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-14-0121-RVW

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  9 in total

1.  Extending the durability of cultivar resistance by limiting epidemic growth rates.

Authors:  Kevin Carolan; Joe Helps; Femke van den Berg; Ruairidh Bain; Neil Paveley; Frank van den Bosch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Dose and number of applications that maximize fungicide effective life exemplified by Zymoseptoria tritici on wheat - a model analysis.

Authors:  F van den Berg; N D Paveley; F van den Bosch
Journal:  Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.590

3.  Evolution of generalist resistance to herbicide mixtures reveals a trade-off in resistance management.

Authors:  David Comont; Claudia Lowe; Richard Hull; Laura Crook; Helen L Hicks; Nawaporn Onkokesung; Roland Beffa; Dylan Z Childs; Robert Edwards; Robert P Freckleton; Paul Neve
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Fungicides: An Overlooked Pesticide Class?

Authors:  Jochen P Zubrod; Mirco Bundschuh; Gertie Arts; Carsten A Brühl; Gwenaël Imfeld; Anja Knäbel; Sylvain Payraudeau; Jes J Rasmussen; Jason Rohr; Andreas Scharmüller; Kelly Smalling; Sebastian Stehle; Ralf Schulz; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  Unconventional Yeasts Are Tolerant to Common Antifungals, and Aureobasidium pullulans Has Low Baseline Sensitivity to Captan, Cyprodinil, and Difenoconazole.

Authors:  Electine Magoye; Maja Hilber-Bodmer; Melanie Pfister; Florian M Freimoser
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-15

6.  Transcriptomic Analysis of Resistant and Wild-Type Isolates Revealed Fludioxonil as a Candidate for Controlling the Emerging Isoprothiolane Resistant Populations of Magnaporthe oryzae.

Authors:  Zuo-Qian Wang; Fan-Zhu Meng; Liang-Fen Yin; Wei-Xiao Yin; Liang Lv; Xiao-Lin Yang; Xiang-Qian Chang; Shu Zhang; Chao-Xi Luo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Mixtures of Macro and Micronutrients Control Grape Powdery Mildew and Alter Berry Metabolites.

Authors:  Lior Gur; Yigal Cohen; Omer Frenkel; Ron Schweitzer; Meir Shlisel; Moshe Reuveni
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

8.  Sensitivity of the Pyrenophora teres Population in Algeria to Quinone outside Inhibitors, Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors and Demethylation Inhibitors.

Authors:  Hamama-Imène Lammari; Alexandra Rehfus; Gerd Stammler; Hamida Benslimane
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.795

9.  Management of Pyrenophora teres f. teres, the Causal Agent of Net Form Net Blotch of Barley, in A Two-Year Field Experiment in Central Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Tini; Lorenzo Covarelli; Giacomo Ricci; Emilio Balducci; Maurizio Orfei; Giovanni Beccari
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-02-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.