| Literature DB >> 25140335 |
Fang-Ju Lin1, Feng-Lin Yen2, Pei-Chun Chen1, Moo-Chin Wang1, Chun-Nan Lin1, Chiang-Wen Lee3, Horng-Huey Ko1.
Abstract
Phyla nodiflora is a creeping perennial herb, widely distributed in the most tropical and subtropical regions. It has been used as a folk medicine, herbal beverage, or folk cosmetic. For these usages, the development of a chemical quality control method of this plant is necessary. In the present study, ten compounds, namely, 3,7,4',5'-tetrahydroxy-3'-methoxyflavone (1), nodifloretin (2), 4'-hydroxywogonin (3), onopordin (4), cirsiliol (5), 5,7,8,4'-tetrahydroxy-3'-methoxyflavone (6), eupafolin (7), hispidulin (8), larycitrin (9), and β-sitosterol were isolated from the methanolic extract of the aerial part of P. nodiflora (PNM) and their structures were identified by 1D-NMR comparing their spectra with the literature. The antioxidant activities of these compounds were evaluated by free radical scavenging activity and tyrosinase inhibitory effect in cell-free systems. Compounds 4, 5, and 7 showed strong antioxidant activity. To control the quality of P. nodiflora, a simple and reliable method of high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV) was established for both the fingerprint analysis and the quantitative determination of two selected active compounds, onopordin (4) and eupafolin (7). Statistical analysis of the obtained data demonstrated that our method achieved the desired linearity, precision, and accuracy. The results indicated that the developed method can be used as a quality evaluation method for PNM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25140335 PMCID: PMC4129175 DOI: 10.1155/2014/528653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Structure of compounds 1–9 of P. nodiflora.
|
|
Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of compounds 1–9 isolated from P. nodiflora a.
| Samples | DPPH∙ | ABTS∙+ | O2 ∙− | Tyrosinase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC50
c ( | IC50
d ( | |||
|
| —e | —e | —e | —e |
|
| 198.2 ± 3.8 | 62.2 ± 2.5 | 42.3 ± 1.5 | 127.6 ± 1.3 |
|
| >300 | >300 | 59.9 ± 2.1 | 169.9 ± 3.8 |
|
| 24.7 ± 1.2 | 53.7 ± 3.9 | 23.5 ± 0.5 | 65.8 ± 3.2 |
|
| 21.8 ± 1.2 | 58.4 ± 2.7 | 10.7 ± 1.3 | 121.8 ± 4.8 |
|
| >300 | >300 | 34.6 ± 2.4 | 152.8 ± 4.4 |
|
| 24.1 ± 0.4 | 30.5 ± 1.2 | 8.3 ± 0.4 | 56.0 ± 5.0 |
|
| 57.5 ± 2.7 | 55.3 ± 3.8 | 146.0 ± 2.2 | |
|
| —e | —e | —e | —e |
| Apigeninb,+ | >300 | 159.6 ± 4.4 | 81.3 ± 2.0 | 304.8 ± 3.1 |
| Vit. Cb | 64.6 ± 4.4 | 49.9 ± 2.1 | 23.5 ± 1.7 | —e |
| Kojic acidb | —e | —e | —e | 88.1 ± 1.8 |
aValues are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). bApigenin, Vit. C, and Kojic acid are used as positive controls. +The data of apigenin are referred to previous report (Lan et al. 2013) [15]. cSC50 is the concentration of test samples that scavenges 50% radicals. dIC50 is the concentration of test samples that inhibits 50% tyrosinase. eNot tested.
Figure 1Lineweaver-Burk plot of xanthine oxidase inhibition of eupafolin (7) with various concentrations of xanthine. (×) Without eupafolin, (▲) 5 μM of eupafolin, (●) 10 μM of eupafolin, and (○) 20 μM of eupafolin. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 2Lineweaver-Burk plot of tyrosinase inhibition of (a) onopordin (4) and (b) eupafolin (7) with various concentrations of tyrosine. (a) (◆) Without onopordin, (■) 10 μM of onopordin, (▲) 60 μM of onopordin, and (×) 100 μM of onopordin. (b) (■) Without eupafolin, (▲) 28 μM of eupafolin, (×) 56 μM of eupafolin, and (◆) 112 μM of eupafolin. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 3(A) The chromatogram of mixture standard compounds: nodifloretin (2), onopordin (4), and eupafolin (7). (B) Chromatographic fingerprint of PNM (2010-06-PNM) by HPLC-UV at 326 nm.
Calibration curves, linear ranges, and LODs and LOQs of onopordin (4) and eupafolin (7) by HPLC.
| Analytes | Calibration curve | linear range ( |
| LOD ( | LOQ ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 0.50–15.0 | 0.9999 | 0.05 | 0.26 |
|
|
| 1.0–10.0 | 0.9994 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
Analytical results of intra- and interday variability of onopordin (4) and eupafolin (7).
| Analytes | Precision ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration ( | Intraday R.S.D. (%) | Interday R.S.D. (%) | |
|
| 0.8 | 2.34 | 1.29 |
| 6 | 2.58 | 4.68 | |
| 12 | 2.89 | 1.30 | |
|
| |||
|
| 2 | 2.31 | 6.99 |
| 4.5 | 3.49 | 1.50 | |
| 8.5 | 3.97 | 2.95 | |
Recoveries of onopordin (4) and eupafolin (7) in the aerial part of P. nodiflora (2010-06-PNM) (n = 3).
| Analytes | Original (mg/g) | Spiked (mg/g) | Found (mg/g) | Recovery (%) | R.S.D (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.545 | 0.200 | 0.732 | 93.50 | 2.40 |
|
| 0.381 | 0.150 | 0.527 | 97.33 | 0.91 |
Figure 4The HPLC-fingerprints of three extracts of PNM from different manufactures. (A) 2007-02-PNM; (B) 2009-06-PNM; (C) 2010-06-PNM.