Literature DB >> 25140057

CT chest and gantry rotation time: does the rotation time influence image quality?

Martin Beeres1, Julian L Wichmann2, Jijo Paul2, Emmanuel Mbalisike2, Mohamed Elsabaie2, Thomas J Vogl2, Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) gantry rotation time is one factor influencing image quality. Until now, there has been no report investigating the influence of gantry rotation time on chest CT image quality.
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of faster gantry rotation time on image quality and subjective and objective image parameters in chest CT imaging.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chest CT scans from 160 patients were examined in this study. All scans were performed using a single-source mode (collimation, 128 × 0.6 mm; pitch, 1.2) on a dual-source CT scanner. Only gantry rotation time was modified, while other CT parameters were kept stable for each scan (120 kV/110 reference mAs). Patients were divided into four groups based on rotation time: group 1, 1 s/ rotation (rot); group 2, 0.5 s/rot; group 3, 0.33 s/rot; group 4, 0.28 s/rot. Two blinded radiologists subjectively compared CT image quality, noise, and artifacts, as well as radiation exposure, from all groups. For objective comparison, all image datasets were analyzed by a radiologist with 5 years of experience concerning objective measurements as well as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
RESULTS: We found that faster gantry rotation times (0.28 s/rot and 0.33 s/rot) resulted in more streak artifacts, image noise, and decreased image quality. However, there was no significant difference in radiation exposure between faster and slower rotation times (P > 0.7).
CONCLUSION: Faster CT gantry rotation reduces scan time and motion artifacts. However, accelerating rotation time increases image noise and streak artifacts. Therefore, a slower CT gantry rotation speed is still recommended for higher image quality in some cases. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT artifacts; CT image quality; CT radiation exposure; Chest computed tomography (CT); gantry rotation time

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25140057     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114544242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  CT of facial fracture fixation: an experimental study of artefact reducing methods.

Authors:  Elina M Peltola; Teemu Mäkelä; Ville Haapamäki; Anni Suomalainen; Junnu Leikola; Seppo K Koskinen; Mika Kortesniemi; Mika P Koivikko
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The effect of variations in CT scan protocol on femoral finite element failure load assessment using phantomless calibration.

Authors:  Ali Ataei; Jelle Eikhout; Ruud G H van Leeuwen; Esther Tanck; Florieke Eggermont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence-based recommendations for musculoskeletal kinematic 4D-CT studies using wide area-detector scanners: a phantom study with cadaveric correlation.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Anne-Sophie Formery; Gabriela Hossu; Daniel Winninger; Toufik Batch; Alban Gervaise; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Low-dose CT pulmonary angiography on a 15-year-old CT scanner: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Moritz Kaup; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Jan E Scholtz; Moritz H Albrecht; Andreas Bucher; Claudia Frellesen; Thomas J Vogl; Martin Beeres
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Feasibility of bronchial wall quantification in low- and ultralow-dose third-generation dual-source CT: An ex vivo lung study.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Gert Jan Pelgrim; Jing Yan; Hao Zhang; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Xueqian Xie
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.