Literature DB >> 25139518

Incidental colonic focal FDG uptake on PET/CT: can the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) guide us in the timing of colonoscopy?

F B van Hoeij1, R G M Keijsers, B C A J Loffeld, G Dun, P H G M Stadhouders, B L A M Weusten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients undergoing (18)F-FDG PET/CT, incidental colonic focal lesions can be indicative of inflammatory, premalignant or malignant lesions. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of these lesions, representing the FDG uptake intensity, might be helpful in differentiating malignant from benign lesions, and thereby be helpful in determining the urgency of colonoscopy. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and underlying pathology of incidental PET-positive colonic lesions in a large cohort of patients, and to determine the usefulness of the SUVmax in differentiating benign from malignant pathology.
METHODS: The electronic records of all patients who underwent FDG PET/CT from January 2010 to March 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The main indications for PET/CT were: characterization of an indeterminate mass on radiological imaging, suspicion or staging of malignancy, and suspicion of inflammation. In patients with incidental focal FDG uptake in the large bowel, data regarding subsequent colonoscopy were retrieved, if performed within 120 days. The final diagnosis was defined using colonoscopy findings, combined with additional histopathological assessment of the lesion, if applicable.
RESULTS: Of 7,318 patients analysed, 359 (5 %) had 404 foci of unexpected colonic FDG uptake. In 242 of these 404 lesions (60 %), colonoscopy follow-up data were available. Final diagnoses were: adenocarcinoma in 25 (10 %), adenoma in 90 (37 %), and benign in 127 (53 %). The median [IQR] SUVmax was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma (16.6 [12 - 20.8]) than in benign lesions (8.2 [5.9 - 10.1]; p < 0.0001), non-advanced adenoma (8.3 [6.1 - 10.5]; p < 0.0001) and advanced adenoma (9.7 [7.2 - 12.6]; p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve of SUVmax for malignant versus nonmalignant lesions had an area under the curve of 0.868 (SD ± 0.038), the optimal cut-off value being 11.4 (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 82 %, positive predictive value 34 %, negative predictive value 98 %).
CONCLUSION: In these patients with incidental colonic focal activity undergoing PET/CT (the largest series published to date), malignancies had significantly higher SUVmax values than all other types of lesions. However, SUVmax could not distinguish between benign lesions and adenomas. In conclusion, all incidental findings in the colon should be further evaluated and lesions with SUVmax ≥11.4 should be evaluated without delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139518     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2887-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

Review 1.  The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology.

Authors:  J F Vansteenkiste; S G Stroobants
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 2.  Randomized controlled trials on PET: a systematic review of topics, design, and quality.

Authors:  Fülöp Scheibler; Polina Zumbé; Inger Janssen; Melanie Viebahn; Milly Schröer-Günther; Robert Grosselfinger; Elke Hausner; Stefan Sauerland; Stefan Lange
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Incidental focal colonic lesions found on (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan: further support for a national guideline on definitive management.

Authors:  A L Farquharson; A Chopra; A Ford; S Matthews; S N Amin; R De Noronha
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Detection of incidental colorectal tumours with 18F-labelled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  J Peng; Y He; J Xu; J Sheng; S Cai; Z Zhang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection.

Authors:  Francois Jamar; John Buscombe; Arturo Chiti; Paul E Christian; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Ora Israel; Josep Martin-Comin; Alberto Signore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  PET/CT and vascular disease: current concepts.

Authors:  José Leite Gondim Cavalcanti Filho; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Luiz de Souza Machado Neto; Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt; Romeu Côrtes Domingues; Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation.

Authors:  G J Cook; I Fogelman; M N Maisey
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  Bowel hot spots at PET-CT.

Authors:  Hima B Prabhakar; Dushyant V Sahani; Alan J Fischman; Peter R Mueller; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Incidental finding of focal FDG uptake in the bowel during PET/CT: CT features and correlation with histopathologic results.

Authors:  Pin Lin Kei; Raghunandan Vikram; Henry W D Yeung; John R Stroehlein; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  FDG PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Berud J Krause; Sarah Schwarzenböck; Michael Souvatzoglou
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2013
View more
  12 in total

1.  PET scan findings can be false positive.

Authors:  E Safaie; R Matthews; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Kousgaard; O Thorlacius-Ussing
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Yasemin Gökden; Filiz Özülker; Tamer Özülker
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Assessment of incidental focal colorectal uptake by analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters.

Authors:  Haejun Lee; Kyung-Hoon Hwang; Kwang An Kwon
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 5.  Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT.

Authors:  Deborah Pencharz; Malavika Nathan; Thomas L Wagner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Postrenal Transplant Metastatic Colonic Neoplasm: Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder or Adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  H Lal; P Yadav; M Dey; N Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2017 May-Jun

7.  Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Eugénie Rigault; Laurence Lenoir; Guillaume Bouguen; Mael Pagenault; Astrid Lièvre; Etienne Garin; Laurent Siproudhis; Jean-François Bretagne
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-13

8.  Functional assessment of prefrontal lobes in patients with major depression disorder using a dual-mode technique of 3D-arterial spin labeling and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Chang Fu; Dapeng Shi; Yongju Gao; Junling Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer: Parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Arnaldo Stanzione; Salvatore Guarino; Valeria Romeo; Lorenzo Ugga; Federica Romano; Giovanni Storto; Simone Maurea; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luboldt; Baerbel Wiedemann; Sebastian Fischer; Boris Bodelle; Hans Joachim Luboldt; Frank Grünwald; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.