Literature DB >> 25139492

Monitoring the response of bone metastases to treatment with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and nuclear medicine techniques: a review and position statement by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer imaging group.

F E Lecouvet1, J N Talbot2, C Messiou3, P Bourguet4, Y Liu5, N M de Souza6.   

Abstract

Assessment of the response to treatment of metastases is crucial in daily oncological practice and clinical trials. For soft tissue metastases, this is done using computed tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using validated response evaluation criteria. Bone metastases, which frequently represent the only site of metastases, are an exception in response assessment systems, because of the nature of the fixed bony defects, their complexity, which ranges from sclerotic to osteolytic and because of the lack of sensitivity, specificity and spatial resolution of the previously available bone imaging methods, mainly bone scintigraphy. Techniques such as MRI and PET are able to detect the early infiltration of the bone marrow by cancer, and to quantify this infiltration using morphologic images, quantitative parameters and functional approaches. This paper highlights the most recent developments of MRI and PET, showing how they enable early detection of bone lesions and monitoring of their response. It reviews current knowledge, puts the different techniques into perspective, in terms of indications, strengths, weaknesses and complementarity, and finally proposes recommendations for the choice of the most adequate imaging technique.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Cancer; EORTC; Imaging; MRI; Metastases; PET; RECIST; Response; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  44 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging diagnostics in bone metastases].

Authors:  L Kintzelé; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Alessandro Stecco; Giuseppe Micci; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Stefano Colagrande; Alfonso Reginelli; Roberto Grassi; Alessandro Carriero; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Galia
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Prospective comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Helle D Zacho; Julie B Nielsen; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Uwe Haberkorn; Nandita deSouza; Katja De Paepe; Katja Dettmann; Niels C Langkilde; Christian Haarmark; Rune V Fisker; Dennis T Arp; Jesper Carl; Jørgen B Jensen; Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Can exercise suppress tumour growth in advanced prostate cancer patients with sclerotic bone metastases? A randomised, controlled study protocol examining feasibility, safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Nicolas H Hart; Robert U Newton; Nigel A Spry; Dennis R Taaffe; Suzanne K Chambers; Kynan T Feeney; David J Joseph; Andrew D Redfern; Tom Ferguson; Daniel A Galvão
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  [Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastasis in Lung Cancer (2019 Version)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-20

6.  Prostate cancer: Birth of a standard: MET-RADS-P for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Treatment response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; J Hillengass; H Goldschmidt; B Wagner; U Haberkorn; K Kopka; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  PET/CT comparing (68)Ga-DOTATATE and other radiopharmaceuticals and in comparison with CT/MRI for the localization of sporadic metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Ingo Janssen; Clara C Chen; Corina M Millo; Alexander Ling; David Taieb; Frank I Lin; Karen T Adams; Katherine I Wolf; Peter Herscovitch; Antonio T Fojo; Inga Buchmann; Electron Kebebew; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  [Bone tumors and metastases: tips for initial diagnosis and follow-up : Update 2019].

Authors:  Kolja M Thierfelder; Sophie Niendorf; Judith S Gerhardt; Marc-An Dré Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Machine learning for differentiating metastatic and completely responded sclerotic bone lesion in prostate cancer: a retrospective radiomics study.

Authors:  Emine Acar; Asım Leblebici; Berat Ender Ellidokuz; Yasemin Başbınar; Gamze Çapa Kaya
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.