Literature DB >> 25139467

Single-item measures for depression and anxiety: Validation of the Screening Tool for Psychological Distress in an inpatient cardiology setting.

Quincy-Robyn Young1, Michelle Nguyen2, Susan Roth2, Ann Broadberry2, Martha H Mackay3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and confer significant cardiac risk, contributing to CVD morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, due to the lack of screening tools that address the specific needs of hospitalized patients, few cardiac inpatient programs offer routine screening for these forms of psychological distress, despite recommendations to do so. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to validate single-item measures for depression and anxiety among cardiac inpatients.
METHODS: Consecutive inpatients were recruited from the cardiology and cardiac surgery step-down units at a university-affiliated, quaternary-care hospital. Subjects completed a questionnaire that included: (a) demographics, (b) single-item-measures for depression and anxiety (from the Screening Tool for Psychological Distress (STOP-D)), and (c) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
RESULTS: One hundred and five participants were recruited with a wide variety of cardiac diagnoses, having a mean age of 66 years, and 28% were women. Both STOP-D items were highly correlated with their corresponding validated measures and demonstrated robust receiver-operator characteristic curves. Severity scores on both items correlated well with established severity cut-off scores on the corresponding subscales of the HADS.
CONCLUSIONS: The STOP-D is a self-administered, self-report measure using two independent items that provide severity scores for depression and anxiety. The tool performs very well compared with other previously validated measures. Requiring no additional scoring and being free, STOP-D offers a simple and valid method for identifying hospitalized cardiac patients who are experiencing psychological distress. This crucial first step triggers initiation of appropriate monitoring and intervention, thus reducing the likelihood of the adverse cardiac outcomes associated with psychological distress. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; anxiety; assessment; cardiac; inpatient; screening; single-item measures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25139467     DOI: 10.1177/1474515114548649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  10 in total

1.  Biopsychosocial factors predict quality of life in thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Dean A Tripp; Edward Abraham; Maude Lambert; Kate Wagg; Erin Bigney; Eden Daly; Phylicia Verreault; Neil Manson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Brief preoperative mind-body therapies for total joint arthroplasty patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Adam W Hanley; Jeremy Gililland; Jill Erickson; Christopher Pelt; Christopher Peters; Jamie Rojas; Eric L Garland
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  Does Reducing Drinking in Patients with Unhealthy Alcohol Use Improve Pain Interference, Use of Other Substances, and Psychiatric Symptoms?

Authors:  Ellen C Caniglia; Elizabeth R Stevens; Maria Khan; Kailyn E Young; Kaoon Ban; Brandon D L Marshall; Natalie E Chichetto; Julie R Gaither; Stephen Crystal; Eva Jennifer Edelman; David A Fiellin; Adam J Gordon; Kendall J Bryant; Janet Tate; Amy C Justice; Ronald Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.928

4.  Association of Alcohol Screening Scores With Adverse Mental Health Conditions and Substance Use Among US Adults.

Authors:  Maria R Khan; Kailyn E Young; Ellen C Caniglia; David A Fiellin; Stephen A Maisto; Brandon D L Marshall; E Jennifer Edelman; Julie R Gaither; Natalie E Chichetto; Janet Tate; Kendall J Bryant; MacRegga Severe; Elizabeth R Stevens; Amy Justice; Scott R Braithwaite
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02

5.  Mostly worse, occasionally better: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Canadian children and adolescents.

Authors:  Katherine Tombeau Cost; Jennifer Crosbie; Evdokia Anagnostou; Catherine S Birken; Alice Charach; Suneeta Monga; Elizabeth Kelley; Rob Nicolson; Jonathon L Maguire; Christie L Burton; Russell J Schachar; Paul D Arnold; Daphne J Korczak
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Locked Down: Economic and Health Effects of COVID-19 Response on Residents of a South African Township.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Ted R Miller; Joel W Grube; Christopher L Ringwalt; Tom Achoki; Tara Polzer Ngwato; Lebogang Shilakoe; Penelope Mkhondo
Journal:  Glob Soc Welf       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  COVID-19 Scientific Facts vs. Conspiracy Theories: Is Science Failing to Pass Its Message?

Authors:  Marios Constantinou; Antonios Kagialis; Maria Karekla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Cancer Survivors and Their Family Members: Korea Community Health Survey, 2012.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Agreement between a single-item measure of anxiety and depression and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Heidi Turon; Mariko Carey; Allison Boyes; Bree Hobden; Sophie Dilworth; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effectiveness of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Jing Jing Su; Doris Sau Fung Yu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.