Literature DB >> 25138992

Supportive post-implant therapy: patient compliance rates and impacting factors: 3-year follow-up.

Eberhard Frisch1, Dirk Ziebolz, Kirstin Vach, Petra Ratka-Krüger.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate patient compliance rates and influential factors regarding a systematic SIT program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, we identified all patients who were provided with implant-supported restorations in the study centre. They had been recommended to attend a SIT program with a 3-month recall. In 2012, a clinical retrospective cohort study on compliance rates over the first 3 years was performed different data were assessed in a regression analysis to identify potential influential factors.
RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 236 patients with 540 implants. Non-compliance rates increased over the 3 years (5.37%/7.78%/13.33%). Total non-compliance was observed in four patients (1.69%). No correlation to patient compliance was detected for "Age," "Gender," "Cardiovascular disease," "Pus/suppuration," or "Surgical case complexity." No decreasing effect of higher compliance rates on the patients' bleeding on probing (BOP+) values was found, but a statistical significance between lower compliance rates and increased pocket probing depth (PPD) was detected. The correlation between the presence of plaque and compliance did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: When patients with implant-supported restorations are strongly recommended to comply with a SIT program with a 3-month recall, considerably high rates of compliance can be achieved.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant; compliance; hygiene; maintenance; peri-implantitis; retrospective study; smoking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138992     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  5 in total

1.  Effect of periodontitis history on implant success: a long-term evaluation during supportive periodontal therapy in a university setting.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Karim Fawzy El-Sayed; Antje Geiken; Anna Plaumann; Sonja Sälzer; Eleonore Behrens; Jörg Wiltfang; Christof E Dörfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Analysis of factors associated with maintenance discontinuation in implant patients.

Authors:  Korenori Arai; Yoshihiro Takeda; Yurie Mori; Rie Terauchi; Takashi Furumori; Sachiko Tanaka; Tatsuro Miyake; Shunsuke Baba; Takayoshi Kawazoe
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-12

Review 3.  The Efficacy of Supportive Peri-Implant Therapies in Preventing Peri-Implantitis and Implant Loss: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Tellervo Tervonen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Evaluation of prognosis related to compliance with supportive periodontal treatment in patients with chronic periodontitis: a clinical retrospective study.

Authors:  Jong-Bin Lee; Hye-Jung Shin; Dae-Yeob Kim; Eun-Kyoung Pang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 5.  Cross-kingdom microbial interactions in dental implant-related infections: is Candida albicans a new villain?

Authors:  João G S Souza; Raphael C Costa; Aline A Sampaio; Victória L Abdo; Bruna E Nagay; Nidia Castro; Belén Retamal-Valdes; Jamil A Shibli; Magda Feres; Valentim A R Barão; Martinna Bertolini
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.