Literature DB >> 25138827

The importance of nanoparticle shape in cancer drug delivery.

Nghia P Truong1, Michael R Whittaker, Catherine W Mak, Thomas P Davis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nanoparticles have been successfully used for cancer drug delivery since 1995. In the design of commercial nanoparticles, size and surface characteristics have been exploited to achieve efficacious delivery. However, the design of optimized drug delivery platforms for efficient delivery to disease sites with minimal off-target effects remains a major research goal. One crucial element of nanoparticle design influencing both pharmacokinetics and cell uptake is nanoparticle morphology (both size and shape). In this succinct review, the authors collate the recent literature to assess the current state of understanding of the influence of nanoparticle shape on the effectiveness of drug delivery with a special emphasis on cancer therapy. AREAS COVERED: This review draws on studies that have focused on the role of nonspherical nanoparticles used for cancer drug delivery. In particular, the authors summarize the influence of nanoparticle shape on biocirculation, biodistribution, cellular uptake and overall drug efficacy. By comparing spherical and nonspherical nanoparticles, they establish some general design principles to serve as guidelines for developing the next generation of nanocarriers for drug delivery. EXPERT OPINION: Pioneering studies on nanoparticles show that nonspherical shapes show great promise as cancer drug delivery vectors. Filamentous or worm-like micelles together with other rare morphologies such as needles or disks may become the norm for next-generation drug carriers, though at present, traditional spherical micelles remain the dominant shape of nanocarriers described in the literature due to synthesis and testing difficulties. The few reports that do exist describing nonspherical nanoparticles show a number of favorable properties that should encourage more efforts to develop facile and versatile nanoparticle synthesis methodologies with the flexibility to create different shapes, tunable sizes and adaptable surface chemistries. In addition, the authors note that there is a current lack of understanding into the factors governing (and optimizing) the inter-relationships of size, surface characteristics and shapes of many nanoparticles proposed for use in cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer nanomedicine; nanoparticle morphology; non-spherical; therapeutic index

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138827     DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2014.950564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1742-5247            Impact factor:   6.648


  71 in total

1.  Soil mobility of synthetic and virus-based model nanopesticides.

Authors:  Paul L Chariou; Alan B Dogan; Alexandra G Welsh; Gerald M Saidel; Harihara Baskaran; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite a Potential Universal Nanocarrier for Cellular Internalization & Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ashu Srivastav; Balasaheb Chandanshive; Prajakta Dandekar; Deepa Khushalani; Ratnesh Jain
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Nanomaterial-Enabled Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sabina Quader; Kazunori Kataoka
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Nano- and microparticles at fluid and biological interfaces.

Authors:  S Dasgupta; T Auth; G Gompper
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.333

5.  Nanoparticle formulations that allow for sustained delivery and brain targeting of the neuropeptide oxytocin.

Authors:  Rokon Uz Zaman; Nihal S Mulla; Keegan Braz Gomes; Cherilyn D'Souza; Kevin Sean Murnane; Martin J D'Souza
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 6.  Nanoparticle design strategies for enhanced anticancer therapy by exploiting the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Yunlu Dai; Can Xu; Xiaolian Sun; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Effects of Nanoprobe Morphology on Cellular Binding and Inflammatory Responses: Hyaluronan-Conjugated Magnetic Nanoworms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Authors:  Seyedmehdi Hossaini Nasr; Anne Tonson; Mohammad H El-Dakdouki; David C Zhu; Dalen Agnew; Robert Wiseman; Chunqi Qian; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 8.  Current approaches for safer design of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Ruth Hwang; Vahid Mirshafiee; Yifang Zhu; Tian Xia
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  The Effect of Cage Shape on Nanoparticle-Based Drug Carriers: Anticancer Drug Release and Efficacy via Receptor Blockade Using Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide Nanocages.

Authors:  Sham Rampersaud; Justin Fang; Zengyan Wei; Kristina Fabijanic; Stefan Silver; Trisha Jaikaran; Yuleisy Ruiz; Murielle Houssou; Zhiwei Yin; Shengping Zheng; Ayako Hashimoto; Ayuko Hoshino; David Lyden; Shahana Mahajan; Hiroshi Matsui
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Cocaine analogue conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for labeling and imaging dopaminergic neurons.

Authors:  Mike Jeon; Guanyou Lin; Zachary R Stephen; Josey E Vechey; Manjot Singh; Richard Revia; Amy Hauck Newman; Diana Martinez; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.