Literature DB >> 25138578

Usefulness of the diameter-axial-polar nephrometry score for predicting perioperative parameters in robotic partial nephrectomy.

Young Eun Yoon1, Kyung Hwa Choi, Kwang Suk Lee, Kwang Hyun Kim, Koon Ho Rha, Young Deuk Choi, Woong Kyu Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to verify the association between diameter-axial-polar (DAP) nephrometry and surgical outcomes, postoperative renal function, and perioperative complications in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).
METHODS: Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry was assessed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging on 158 patients who received RPN between July 2007 and February 2013. Demographic data, surgical data, and perioperative complications were recorded, and percent change between the preoperative and last estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined. Linear regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the DAP sum score and warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and percent decrease in eGFR. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between each DAP scoring parameter and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 50.5 years and median DAP sum score was 6. On linear regression, the DAP sum score was associated with WIT and EBL. On multivariable regression, all DAP parameters were associated with WIT, but the polar distance was not associated with EBL. Patients with a higher DAP sum score showed greater decrease in eGFR after RPN. Patients with a DAP sum score of 6 or higher had a higher risk of major complications than those with a DAP sum score below 6.
CONCLUSIONS: Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry predicted WIT and EBL in patients who underwent RPN. It was also associated with the decrease in eGFR and rate of major perioperative complications, and thus can be useful for surgical planning or patient counseling before RPN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138578     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1372-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Incidental renal tumors: casting doubt on the efficacy of early intervention.

Authors:  J K Parsons; M S Schoenberg; H B Carter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Is diameter-axial-polar scoring predictive of renal functional damage in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy? An evaluation using technetium Tc 99m (⁹⁹Tcm) diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid (DTPA) glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Linhui Wang; Mingmin Li; Wei Chen; Zhenjie Wu; Chen Cai; Chun Xiang; Jing Sheng; Bing Liu; Qing Yang; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: effect on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Sangchul Lee; Jongjin Oh; Seong Kyu Hong; Sang Eun Lee; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Marc C Smaldone; Brian L Egleston; Brandon J Manley; Daniel J Canter; Jay Simhan; Stephen A Boorjian; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Alexander Kutikov; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Marc Smaldone; Ervin Teper; Rosalia Viterbo; Stephen A Boorjian; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Correlation of the RENAL nephrometry score with warm ischemia time after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Fatih Altunrende; Humberto Laydner; Adrian V Hernandez; Riccardo Autorino; Rakesh Khanna; Michael A White; Wahib Isac; Gregory Spana; Shahab Hillyer; Bo Yang; Rachid Yakoubi; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Robert J Stein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system.

Authors:  Surendra B Kolla; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Khaled S Hafez; David C Miller; Chang He; J Stuart Wolf; Alon Z Weizer
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.369

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Riccardo Autorino; Vincenzo Altieri; Steven Campbell; Vincenzo Ficarra; Inderbir Gill; Alexander Kutikov; Alex Mottrie; Vincenzo Mirone; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 24.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.