Literature DB >> 25138237

Variation in seminal plasma alters the ability of ram spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation.

J P Rickard1, R E Schmidt1, J W Maddison1, R Bathgate1, G W Lynch1, X Druart2, S P de Graaf1.   

Abstract

Variation in the effect of seminal plasma on sperm function and fertility has been hypothesised to be due to differences between males and their seminal plasma composition. The freezing resilience of individual rams (n=17) was investigated to characterise inter-male variation. This was determined by measuring the degree of change in motility induced by cryopreservation (Experiment 1). Experiment 2 examined the effect of pooled seminal plasma from rams identified as having high or low resilience to freezing on the cryosurvival of washed spermatozoa from either high (n=3) or low (n=3) sperm freezing resilience rams. Immediately after thawing and throughout the incubation period (0-4h), spermatozoa from high-resilience rams frozen with high-resilience seminal plasma demonstrated superior motility to spermatozoa from high-resilience rams frozen with low-resilience seminal plasma (P<0.001). Similarly, spermatozoa from low-resilience rams frozen with high-resilience seminal plasma exhibited higher motility than spermatozoa from low-resilience rams frozen with low-resilience seminal plasma immediately after thawing (0h; P<0.001). The present study shows that variation in freezing resilience of ram spermatozoa is related to the source and composition of the seminal plasma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25138237     DOI: 10.1071/RD14123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary consequences of environmental effects on gamete performance.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Simone Immler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Terminal Mannose Residues in Seminal Plasma Glycoproteins of Infertile Men Compared to Fertile Donors.

Authors:  Beata Olejnik; Anna Jarząb; Ewa M Kratz; Mariusz Zimmer; Andrzej Gamian; Mirosława Ferens-Sieczkowska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Proteomic characterization of fresh spermatozoa and supernatant after cryopreservation in relation to freezability of carp (Cyprinus carpio L) semen.

Authors:  Mariola A Dietrich; Andrzej Ciereszko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Individual variation in fresh and frozen semen of Bali bulls (Bos sondaicus).

Authors:  R Indriastuti; M F Ulum; R I Arifiantini; B Purwantara
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 5.  Sperm Cryodamage in Ruminants: Understanding the Molecular Changes Induced by the Cryopreservation Process to Optimize Sperm Quality.

Authors:  Patricia Peris-Frau; Ana Josefa Soler; María Iniesta-Cuerda; Alicia Martín-Maestro; Irene Sánchez-Ajofrín; Daniela Alejandra Medina-Chávez; María Rocío Fernández-Santos; Olga García-Álvarez; Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Vidal Montoro; J Julián Garde
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Protein signatures of seminal plasma from bulls with contrasting frozen-thawed sperm viability.

Authors:  Fabio P Gomes; Robin Park; Arabela G Viana; Carolina Fernandez-Costa; Einko Topper; Abdullah Kaya; Erdogan Memili; John R Yates; Arlindo A Moura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Increasing the Yield and Cryosurvival of Spermatozoa from Rhinoceros Ejaculates Using the Enzyme Papain.

Authors:  Jessica P Rickard; Kelsey Pool; Simon P de Graaf; Timothy Portas; Natalie Rourke; Miriam Wiesner; Thomas B Hildebrandt; Frank Göritz; Robert Hermes
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Cryopreservation in rhinoceros-Setting a new benchmark for sperm cryosurvival.

Authors:  Robert Hermes; Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt; Frank Göritz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.