Literature DB >> 25138019

An online version of the Mooney Face Test: phenotypic and genetic associations.

Roeland J Verhallen1, Jenny M Bosten2, Patrick T Goodbourn3, Gary Bargary4, Adam J Lawrance-Owen2, J D Mollon2.   

Abstract

The Mooney Face Test is a widely used test of face perception, but was originally designed to be administered by personal interview. We have developed a three-alternative forced-choice version for online testing. We tested 397 healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 42 (M=24 years). There was a wide range of performance (64-100% correct; M=89.6%). We observed a significant sex difference favoring males (.31 standard deviation; p =.004). In addition, independently of sex, higher 2D:4D digit ratios were significantly associated with higher scores (ρ=.14, p=.006). A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for a subset of 370 participants identified an association between Mooney performance and a polymorphism in the RAPGEF5 gene (rs1522280; p=9.68×10(-8)). This association survives a permutation test (p=.031).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closure; Face perception; Genome-wide association study (GWAS); Gestalt perception; Individual differences; Mooney Face Test; RAPGEF5; rs1522280

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138019     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Increased face detection responses on the mooney faces test in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Albert R Powers; Philip R Corlett; Steven M Silverstein; Judy L Thompson; James M Gold; Jason Schiffman; James A Waltz; Trevor F Williams; Richard E Zinbarg; Vijay A Mittal; Lauren M Ellman; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Jason A Levin; Eren Kafadar; Joshua Kenney; Dillon Smith
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  Mooney face stimuli for visual perception research.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Lucia Melloni; Aaron Schurger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Face-n-Food: Gender Differences in Tuning to Faces.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Klaus Scheffler; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Individual differences in face identity processing.

Authors:  Jennifer M McCaffery; David J Robertson; Andrew W Young; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

6.  Individual differences in the detection, matching and memory of faces.

Authors:  Matthew C Fysh
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

7.  Neurophysiological correlates of holistic face processing in adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sandra Naumann; Ulrike Senftleben; Megha Santhosh; James McPartland; Sara Jane Webb
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Stimulus-Specific Individual Differences in Holistic Perception of Mooney Faces.

Authors:  Teresa Canas-Bajo; David Whitney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.