| Literature DB >> 25136302 |
Luca Lavagnino1, Federico Amianto2, Federico D'Agata2, Zirui Huang3, Paolo Mortara2, Giovanni Abbate-Daga2, Enrica Marzola2, Angela Spalatro2, Secondo Fassino2, Georg Northoff4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alterations in the resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) of several brain networks have been demonstrated in eating disorders. However, very few studies are currently available on brain network dysfunctions in bulimia nervosa (BN). The somatosensory network is central in processing body-related stimuli and it may be altered in BN. The present study therefore aimed to investigate rs-FC in the somatosensory network in bulimic women.Entities:
Keywords: bulimia; eating disorders; fMRI; functional connectivity; resting state; somatosensory network
Year: 2014 PMID: 25136302 PMCID: PMC4120855 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Demographic and psychopathology variables.
| CN ( | BN ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Age (years) | 23 | 3 | 23 | 5 | −0.4 | 0.96 |
| Education (years) | 16 | 2 | 15 | 2 | −1.2 | 0.22 |
| BMI | 21 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 0.45 | 0.65 |
| EDI II Bulimia | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 18.5 | <0.001 |
| EDI II Body Dissatisfaction | 7 | 7 | 20 | 6 | 32 | <0.001 |
| EDI II interoceptive awareness | 1 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 19 | <0.001 |
| Length of illness (months) | – | – | 17 | 12 | – | |
CN, healthy control women; BN, bulimic women; BMI, body mass index; EDI II, Eating Disorder Inventory; T, t test.
Figure 1Psychopathology scores in patients with bulimia (BN) and control subjects (CN). Bu = bulimia; BD = body dissatisfaction; IA = interoceptive awareness. On the Y axis, we plotted the average scores for the bulimia and control groups. Error bars represent die standard error. ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Within-network connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), somatosensory network, salience network, and executive network. On the Y axis, we plotted the average of the Pearson correlations between the time series of all the couples of nodes inside each network. Error bars represent the standard error. Note the significant difference between the two groups in the somatosensory network. *P < 0.05 (Bonferroni correction applied).
Figure 3Seed-based analysis of the functional connectivity of the paracentral lobule, comparing patients with bulimia nervosa with healthy controls. Areas of significant difference (cluster-wise p < 0.05 corrected; threshold at t > 2.7) between bulimic patients and controls: (A) left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) (peak = 1, 40, 20; t = 3.7; Brodmann area 29); (B) right cuneus (RC peak = −1, 85, 14; t = 4.2; Brodmann area 18). (C) right middle occipital gyrus (OG) (peak = −43, 76, 2; t = 3.6; Brodmann area 19); analyses conducted with age, BMI, and depressive symptoms as covariates. L, left; R, right. The graphs show the relationship between the Z-scores of the functional connectivity in the area (C) and the psychopathology scales. The correlations were confirmed with bootstrapping.