Literature DB >> 25136203

Application of rapid ultrasound in shock protocol in the ICU for management of shock.

Srishti S Jain1, Kedar K Toraskar1, Azizullah H Khan1, Yunus S Loya1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25136203      PMCID: PMC4134638          DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.138173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, One of the most challenging tasks in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is to rapidly determine the cause of shock in a critically ill patient and decide the most appropriate treatment in a short time. We describe a case of 34-year-old male with shock and impending respiratory failure presenting to ICU and its management based on information provided by rapid ultrasound in shock (RUSH) protocol. A 34-year-old male patient presented to the ICU with the complaints of recent onset severe dyspnea and dry cough. There was no history of chest pain, fever, and chest trauma. His physical examination revealed tachycardia (pulse rate: 112/min), tachypnea (respiratory rate: 48/min) and hypotension (blood pressure: 80/50 mmHg). Electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia, right axis deviation with S1Q3T3 pattern. Patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated in view of impending respiratory failure and shock. Along with initial resuscitation for the shock, she underwent ultrasound according to RUSH Protocol to evaluate the cause of shock. Pump: Grossly enlarged right atrium and right ventricle with D shaped left ventricle. McConnell's sign was present. Pulmonary artery was dilated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure 80 mm of Hg. Left ventricular contractility was adequate. There was no evidence of pericardial effusion or valvular dysfunction. Tank: Inferior vena cava was full and noncollapsing with respiration. Pipes: Deep venous thrombosis screening was done (femoral vein in the femoral canal, popliteal vein in popliteal fossa) which was normal. Screening of the aorta was also normal [Figure 1]. With this information, diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) causing obstructive shock was considered. Computerized tomography based pulmonary angiography (CTPA) could not be as the patient was on the ventilator and hemodynamically unstable. We thrombolysed the patient with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator 100 mg intravenous infused over 90 min. SpO2 with subsequent improvement in hemodynamic parameters. Patient was gradually weaned off the ventilator by 5th day. Subsequently, CTPA showed embolism in the main and segmental branches of both pulmonary arteries.
Figure 1

(a) ECG showing S1Q3T3 pattern (b) Chest x-ray showing Palla's sign (prominent right descending pulmonary artery) (c) Dilated right atria and ventricle (d) “D” shaped left ventricle (e and f) Non collapsible IVC seen on m mode (g) Femoral artery and femoral vein (h) Compressible femoral vein (i) CTPA showing bilateral pulmonary artery thromboembolism

(a) ECG showing S1Q3T3 pattern (b) Chest x-ray showing Palla's sign (prominent right descending pulmonary artery) (c) Dilated right atria and ventricle (d) “D” shaped left ventricle (e and f) Non collapsible IVC seen on m mode (g) Femoral artery and femoral vein (h) Compressible femoral vein (i) CTPA showing bilateral pulmonary artery thromboembolism Rapid ultrasound in shock protocol is recently proposed systemic algorithm for evaluation of shock.[1] This protocol involves a three-step bedside sonographic assessment simplified as step 1: Evaluation of pump, step 2: Evaluation of tank, step 3: Evaluation of pipes [Table 1]. By focusing on both the anatomy and the physiology, points of care ultrasound by intensivists may help in differentiating between various etiologies of hypotension in the unstable patient. Characteristic ultrasonography finding facilitates the early diagnosis as well as provides prognostic information in PTE.[23] These findings needs to be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture as similar finding can be seen in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, pulmonary hypertension and right sided myocardial infarction. The relatively poor sensitivity of ultrasound findings necessitates other investigations to rule out the diagnosis of PTE in critically ill patients.
Table 1

Rapid ultrasound in shock protocol: Ultrasonographic findings seen with classic shock states**

Rapid ultrasound in shock protocol: Ultrasonographic findings seen with classic shock states**
  3 in total

1.  Emergency department focused bedside echocardiography in massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Matthew P Borloz; William J Frohna; Carolyn A Phillips; Michael S Antonis
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians.

Authors:  Arthur J Labovitz; Vicki E Noble; Michelle Bierig; Steven A Goldstein; Robert Jones; Smadar Kort; Thomas R Porter; Kirk T Spencer; Vivek S Tayal; Kevin Wei
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll.

Authors:  Phillips Perera; Thomas Mailhot; David Riley; Diku Mandavia
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  SIRS Triggered by Acute Right Ventricular Function, Mimicked Septic Shock.

Authors:  Yingke He; John Ong; Thuan Tong Tan; Brian K P Goh; Sharon G K Ong
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2019-11-27

Review 2.  The POCUS Consult: How Point of Care Ultrasound Helps Guide Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Jake A Rice; Jonathan Brewer; Tyler Speaks; Christopher Choi; Peiman Lahsaei; Bryan T Romito
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.