Literature DB >> 25136165

Thinking beyond the thomson reuters "impact factor".

Gautam N Allahbadia1.   

Abstract

Year:  2014        PMID： 25136165      PMCID： PMC4126951          DOI： 10.1007/s13224-014-0574-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN： 0975-6434


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination.

Authors:  A Fassoulaki; K Papilas; A Paraskeva; K Patris
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Corruption of journal Impact Factors.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

4.  The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.069
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Quality indicators of scientific research.

Authors:  Om P Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  International journal of mental health systems: a bibliometric study.

Authors:  Harry Minas; Alexandra Wright; Mengxue Zhao; Ritsuko Kakuma
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2014-01-06

3.  Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors.

Authors:  Pamela Royle; Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala; Katharine Barnard; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-12

4.  A look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Shiyuan Zhang; Chenglin Ye; James Paul; Aman Arya; Lindsay Hurlburt; Yamini Murthy; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.217
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.