| Literature DB >> 25135889 |
Conrad E Z Chan1, Angeline P C Lim1, Paul A MacAry2, Brendon J Hanson3.
Abstract
Phage display involves the expression of selected proteins on the surface of filamentous phage through fusion with phage coat protein, with the genetic sequence packaged within, linking phenotype to genotype selection. When combined with antibody libraries, phage display allows for rapid in vitro selection of antigen-specific antibodies and recovery of their corresponding coding sequence. Large non-immune and synthetic human libraries have been constructed as well as smaller immune libraries based on capturing a single individual's immune repertoire. This completely in vitro process allows for isolation of antibodies against poorly immunogenic targets as well as those that cannot be obtained by animal immunization, thus further expanding the utility of the approach. Phage antibody display represents the first developed methodology for high throughput screening for human therapeutic antibody candidates. Recently, other methods have been developed for generation of fully human therapeutic antibodies, such as single B-cell screening, next-generation genome sequencing and transgenic mice with human germline B-cell genes. While each of these have their particular advantages, phage display has remained a key methodology for human antibody discovery due its in vitro process. Here, we review the continuing role of this technique alongside other developing technologies for therapeutic antibody discovery. © The Japanese Society for Immunology. 2014. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.Entities:
Keywords: phage display; therapeutic antibodies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25135889 PMCID: PMC7185696 DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxu082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Immunol ISSN: 0953-8178 Impact factor: 4.823
Fig. 1.(A) Structure of a typical IgG molecule. Each antibody comprises two heavy and two light chains each of which have four and two immunoglobulin domains, respectively. The first domain is variable and determines specificity (VL and VH) while the second domain of the light chain (CL) and the second to fourth domains of the heavy (CH1-3) are constant across all antibodies of the same isotype. The light chain and first two domains of the heavy chain form the Fab, which is the portion expressed on the phage. The last two domains of the heavy chain form the Fc and are responsible for immune function through engagement of receptors on immune cells. Heavy and light chains are linked through a single disulfide bond (orange) between the CL and CH1 domains and the two heavy chains have multiple disulfide bonds at the hinge region between the CH1 and CH2. An scFv consists of just variable light and variable heavy domains joined by a flexible polypeptide linker while an sdAb as the name implies is only a single immunoglobulin (usually VH) domain which is sufficient for binding. (B) Variable domain genetic structure and construction of a natural phage display library. Each variable domain consists of three hypervariable CDRs interspersed between the more conserved FRs. The immunoglobulin domain folds such that the CDRs are brought together to form the antigen-binding surface at the tip of the Fab. Degenerate primers (arrows) are used to amplify the entire variable heavy and light chains (or alternatively variable and first constant domain) from a source of B cells and cloned in-frame with the phage coat protein (usually gene III) into E. coli to produce an Fab, scFv or sdAb library. The rest of the phage genome is supplied through replication defective helper phage to produce antibody-displaying phage.
Fig. 2.General strategy for phage panning. Polyclonal phage expressing recombinant antibodies on their surface is applied to target antigen presented as either immobilized on a magnetic bead, polystyrene surface or on the surface of a whole cell. Phage carrying antigen-binding Fab bind and non-specific Fab are removed through stringent washing. Antigen-bound phage is eluted off either typically through pH change or protease digestion and re-infected into E. coli, from which a new library enriched for antigen-binding clones can be made. After several cycles, the library would be sufficiently enriched so that the individual clones can be isolated from E. coli stock, expressed as monoclonal phage, tested, sequenced and the specific antibodies expressed recombinantly.
Comparison of phage display with other in vitro antibody screening techniques
| Phage display | Ribosome display (99) | Yeast display (100) | Single B cell screening (101) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Immune or non-immune donor/synthetic | Immune donor | ||
| Screening size | Up to 1011 | Up to 1014 | Up to 109 | Up to 106 |
| Antibody format | ScFv/Fab/sdAb | ScFv | Fab or IgG | IgG |
| Pros | Robust. Requires minimal instrumentations. Non-physiological and stringent selection conditions possible due to phage stability at pH/temperature extremes. | Cell-free expression and high concentration of ribosome particles permits extremely large practical library sizes. Compulsory PCR step convenient for mutagenesis. | Eukaryotic expression permits proper disulphide bridge formation and N-linked glycosylation. Direct quantitative monoclonal analysis by flow cytometry. | Isolation of naturally paired VH-VL immunoglobulin genes that have gone through affinity maturation. |
| Cons | Lacks post-translational modification of antibody fragments. | Requires optimization due to relative instability of RNA– ribosomal complex. | Smaller library size compared to phage/ribosome display. | Labour intensive and technically challenging. Smallest library size. |
| Affinity maturation | Can be performed | Can be used to select for high- affinity binders. | Can be used to select for high-affinity binders during FACS sorting. | Not required. |