Literature DB >> 25135653

What efficacy measures are clinically relevant and should be used in Cochrane Reviews of acute migraine trials? A viewpoint.

Peer Tfelt-Hansen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochrane Reviews are methodologically of high quality but the clinical relevance of analysed efficacy measures (EMs) should also be assessed.
METHODS: The clinical relevance of EMs used in one systematic Cochrane review of oral zolmitriptan for migraine headache was evaluated.
RESULTS: The following EMs were used: pain free at two hours (30%), headache relief at two hours (60%), sustained pain free for 24 hours (19%) and sustained headache relief for 24 hours (39%). These EMs were also used in four other Cochrane reviews of acute migraine treatment. Of these EMs sustained headache relief for 24 h is not judged clinically relevant.
CONCLUSION: Pain free and sustained pain free are clinically relevant, but the responses are rather low, demonstrating that there is a need for improvement of acute drug treatment in migraine. © International Headache Society 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Migraine; acute treatment; efficacy measures; triptans

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25135653     DOI: 10.1177/0333102414545347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  2 in total

1.  Acupuncture for acute migraine attacks in adults: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Ruosang Du; Yang Wang; Xiaoxu Liu; Zhishun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A universal outcome measure for headache treatments, care-delivery systems and economic analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Steiner; Mattias Linde; Petra Schnell-Inderst
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.277

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.