Literature DB >> 25135547

Optimum on-time duty cycle for micropulse technology.

Kevin R Kirk1, Cecinio Ronquillo1, Jason D Jensen1, Brian Zaugg1, William R Barlow1, Brian C Stagg1, Jeff H Pettey1, Randall J Olson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimum on time for the most efficient removal of lens fragments using micropulsed ultrasound (US).
SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Twenty porcine lens nuclei were soaked in formalin for 2 hours and then divided into 2.0 mm cubes. Using an US machine with a 0.9 mm bent and a 30-degree bevel tip, the on time was varied every millisecond (ms) from 2 ms to 10 ms with the off time kept constant at 10 ms. Efficiency (time to lens removal) and chatter (number of lens fragment repulsions from the tip) were determined.
RESULTS: The most efficient phacoemulsification was achieved with an on time of 6 ms. On times shorter than 6 ms were significantly less efficient (R2=.82, P=.04). Greater on times did not result in a significant difference in efficiency (R2=.03, P=.78) but did appear to have more chatter events when comparing 9 to 10 ms with 2 to 8 ms (P<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: With micropulsed longitudinal US, a 6 ms on time was equally as efficient as longer on times, while shorter on times (2 to 5 ms) had decreased efficiency. At 9 ms and 10 ms on time, significantly more chatter was noted. Therefore, to maximize phacoemulsification, an on-time setting of 6 ms is recommended. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25135547     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  A novel method to compare phacoemulsification parameters in vivo: two halves of one nucleus.

Authors:  Elena Tomilova; Sergey Shukhaev
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Rhett S Thomson; Brian A Bird; Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-12

3.  Optimizing Tip Diameter in Phacoemulsification of Varying Lens Sizes: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Aniket Ramshekar; Joshua Heczko; Ashlie Bernhisel; William Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall Olson; Jeff Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-17

4.  Optimization of Phacoemulsification Tip Gauge on the Oertli CataRhex3 in an in vitro Setting.

Authors:  John S Peterson; Michael R Christensen; Caitlynn Cooper; Christina Mamalis; Ashlie A Bernhisel; Brian Zaugg; William R Barlow; Emilie Ungricht; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-08

5.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Erik Anderson; Geoffrey Hill; John J Chen; Thomas Patrianakos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.