| Literature DB >> 25135459 |
Chuo Li1, Chao Dang, Gang Liu, Li Chen, Jian Zhang, Jingjing Li, Zilin Ou, Yusheng Zhang, Anding Xu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunction has been observed in patients with left-sided anterior corona radiata infarction. However, whether left-sided posterior corona radiata infarction could cause executive dysfunction is unclear. Also, whether secondary damage in the left frontal white matter following ipsilateral posterior corona radiata infarct is causal or not and contributes to the occurrence and development of executive dysfunction, is still uncertain.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25135459 PMCID: PMC4237798 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-014-0044-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Figure 1Ischemic lesion and regions of interest (ROIs) are shown in the traditional magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images from a patient with acute infarction at the left posterior corona radiata. (A) T1-FLAIR obtained at week 1 (W1) after stroke show a hypointense area at the left posterior corona radiata. (B) T2-weighted image and (C) T2-FLAIR images obtained at W1 show a hyperintense area at the left posterior corona radiata. (D), (E) and (F) show the lesion at W12. (G), (I) and (K) mean diffusivity images and (H), (J) and (L) fractional anisotropy images show ROIs in the left and right frontal white matter, posterior periventricular white matter and centrum semiovale.
Patient demographics and clinical data
| 1 | 59 | M | 8 | Hypertension | 11,160 |
| 2 | 67 | F | 6 | Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus | 14,000 |
| 3 | 66 | M | 18 | Hypertension, tobacco use, overweight | 13,300 |
| 4 | 57 | F | 7 | Hypertension, diabetes mellitus | 9,690 |
| 5 | 66 | M | 8 | Hypertension, diabetes mellitus | 6,790 |
| 6 | 65 | M | 6 | Tobacco use | 8,450 |
| 7 | 46 | F | 11 | Hypercholesterolemia | 7,370 |
| 8 | 69 | F | 6 | Hypertension | 10,810 |
| 9 | 63 | M | 8 | Hypertension, tobacco use | 16,200 |
| 10 | 48 | F | 8 | Hypertension | 9,660 |
| 11 | 65 | M | 12 | Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, overweight | 12,150 |
| 12 | 50 | M | 5 | Hypertension, diabetes mellitus | 8,810 |
F: female; M: male; FLAIR: fluid attenuated inversion recovery. The volume of the infarcted lesion was calculated on T2-FLAIR images at week 12 (W12). Controls were matched for age and educational history.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameter values in frontal white matter, posterior periventricular white matter, centrum semiovale and thalamus in patients and controls (mean ± SD)
| Patients | | | | | | |
| LFWM | 0.824 ± 0.095a | 0.815 ± 0.080 | 0.904 ± 0.107bc | 0.388 ± 0.056a | 0.374 ± 0.062 | 0.313 ± 0.054bc |
| RFWM | 0.825 ± 0.089 | 0.821 ± 0.088 | 0.831 ± 0.084 | 0.387 ± 0.062 | 0.385 ± 0.063 | 0.395 ± 0.063 |
| LPPWM | 0.837 ± 0.102 | 0.836 ± 0.096 | 0.839 ± 0.087 | 0.452 ± 0.062 | 0.447 ± 0.061 | 0.431 ± 0.063 |
| RPPWM | 0.853 ± 0.114 | 0.835 ± 0.094 | 0.822 ± 0.085 | 0.444 ± 0.053 | 0.451 ± 0.059 | 0.447 ± 0.053 |
| LCS | 0.766 ± 0.112 | 0.754 ± 0.087 | 0.729 ± 0.104 | 0.387 ± 0.058 | 0.381 ± 0.060 | 0.362 ± 0.055 |
| RCS | 0.772 ± 0.110 | 0.765 ± 0.098 | 0.783 ± 0.105 | 0.383 ± 0.059 | 0.391 ± 0.062 | 0.393 ± 0.064 |
| L thalamus | 0.846 ± 0.080a | 0.830 ± 0.097 | 0.949 ± 0.065bc | 0.338 ± 0.038 | 0.334 ± 0.037 | 0.323 ± 0.032 |
| R thalamus | 0.839 ± 0.788 | 0.840 ± 0.081 | 0.841 ± 0.083 | 0.344 ± 0.042 | 0.344 ± 0.043 | 0.342 ± 0.040 |
| Controls | | | | | | |
| LFWM | 0.804 ± 0.109 | 0.421 ± 0.057 | ||||
| LPPWM | 0.824 ± 0.099 | 0.451 ± 0.057 | ||||
| LCS | 0.764 ± 0.093 | 0.392 ± 0.063 | ||||
| L thalamus | 0.836 ± 0.069 | 0.345 ± 0.051 | ||||
Abbreviations: FA, fractional anisotropy; LCS, left centrum semiovale; LFWM, left frontal white matter; LPPWM, left posterior periventricular white matter; LCS, left centrum semiovale; L thalamus, left thalamus; MD, mean diffusivity; R thalamus, right thalamus; RCS, right centrum semiovale; RFWM, right frontal white matter; RPPWM, right posterior periventricular white matter; W1, the first week; W4, the fourth week; W12, the 12th week.
aP < 0.05, LSD test, comparison between W1 and W12; bP < 0.05, Student’s t-test, comparison between the control and patient groups; cP < 0.05, Student’s t-test, comparison in the left and right region of patients at W12.
The controls were examined only once when they were recruited.
Ultrasound parameters of the left and right internal carotid artery (mean ± SD)
| Patients | 1.21 ± 0.13 | 1.22 ± 0.14 | 1.18 ± 0.09 | 1.18 ± 0.10 | 4.86 ± 0.63 | 4.84 ± 0.61 | 4.97 ± 0.55 | 5.02 ± 0.58 | 61 ± 9.8 | 65 ± 11.1 | 58 ± 8.7 | 60 ± 9.4 | 24.3 ± 3.8 | 24.5 ± 3.7 | 23.9 ± 3.7 | 24.1 ± 3.8 |
| Controls | 1.02 ± 0.19 | 1.04 ± 0.22 | 5.20 ± 0.68 | 5.37 ± 0.73 | 52 ± 8.5 | 53 ± 8.3 | 23.5 ± 5.6 | 24.0 ± 6.1 | ||||||||
Abbreviations: DIA, luminal diameter; EDV, end diastolic velocity; IMT, intima-media thickness; PSV, peak systolic velocity; W1, the first week, W12, the 12th week.
The controls were examined only once when they were recruited.
Values of the mean flow velocity (cm/s) in the left and right anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) (mean ± SD)
| Patients | 55.17 ± 9.53 | 53.85 ± 9.94 | 49.74 ± 9.13 | 50.65 ± 8.06 | 58.94 ± 15.42 | 60.07 ± 11.26 | 63.12 ± 13.63 | 63.26 ± 12.65 | 38.8 ± 10.76 | 37.21 ± 8.10 | 38.17 ± 12.40 | 38.99 ± 13.02 |
| Controls | 46.62 ± 7.05 | 47.81 ± 8.89 | 64.95 ± 9.35 | 62.88 ± 5.40 | 37.20 ± 5.65 | 36.97 ± 6.13 | ||||||
Abbreviations: W1, the first week; W12, the 12th week.
The controls were examined only once when they were recruited.
Cognitive functional scores of patients and controls (mean ± SD)
| MMSE | 26.8 ± 1.6 | 25.4 ± 2.3 | 25.0 ± 1.7 | 29.3 ± 1.5 |
| Trail making B-A test | 160.3 ± 54.7ab | 181.8 ± 52.1b | 224.1 ± 55.1b | 77.2 ± 33.3 |
| Verbal fluency assessment | 40.8 ± 10.3a | 33.9 ± 11.0b | 26.9 ± 11.0b | 42.4 ± 8.1 |
| Digit span backwards test | 7.3 ± 1.5a | 6.3 ± 1.4 | 5.7 ± 1.3b | 7.0 ± 1.7 |
| Digit symbol test | 32.6 ± 6.5ab | 26.6 ± 6.5b | 22.3 ± 4.9b | 45.6 ± 9.2 |
Abbreviations: MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; W1, within the first week; W4, the fourth week; W12, the 12th week.
aP < 0.05, LSD test, comparison between W1 and W12 in patients; bP < 0.05, Student’s t-test, comparison between the control and patient groups.
Figure 2Scatter plot with lines of best fit showing the relationship between the change values of diffusivity (mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy) in the left frontal white matter and the change values of executive function (trail making B-A, verbal fluency assessment, digit span backwards and digit symbol tests) in patients from W1 to W12. A-H show the relationship between Δmean diffusivity and Δtrail making B-A (A), Δverbal fluency (B), Δdigit span backwards (C), Δdigit symbol (D), and between Δfractional anisotropy and Δtrail making B-A (E), Δverbal fluency (F), Δdigit span backwards (G), Δdigit symbol (H).