| Literature DB >> 25135158 |
Raymond Farah1, Revital Shurtz-Swirski, Rola Khamisy-Farah.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Inflammation, insulin resistance, and oxidative stress (OS) are among the mechanisms that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension (EH). Peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs) are primed in EH patients, releasing uncontrolled superoxide anions contributing to OS in these patients. PMNL priming correlates with insulin resistance and PMNL intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)]i). Recent studies have attributed additional anti-ischemic and antioxidative characteristics to the antihypertensive drug, lercanidipine, a third-generation calcium-channel blocker. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible nontraditional effect of 2 months of lercanidipine treatment on insulin resistance and on PMNL-related inflammation in EH patients.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 25135158 PMCID: PMC4107444 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-012-0004-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Ther ISSN: 2193-6544
The changes in measurements of EH patients
| NC | Untreated EH | 1-month treatment | 2-month treatment |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundus | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 120 ± 3.0a | 162 ± 4.0 | 146 ± 3.0a | 143 ± 3.0a | <0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 69 ± 2.0a | 100 ± 1.0 | 89 ± 3.0a | 87 ± 2.0a | <0.01 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 86 ± 2.0a | 120 ± 2.0 | 108 ± 2.0a | 107 ± 2.0a | <0.01 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 205 ± 1.7 | 230 ± 9.3 | 225 ± 13.2 | 226 ± 15.6 | NS |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 120 ± 3.2 | 158 ± 26.0 | 149 ± 19.2 | 130 ± 23.7 | NS |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 58 ± 0.7 | 42.8 ± 1.4 | 40.4 ± 2.0 | 39.2 ± 3.3 | NS |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 114 ± 1.3 | 155 ± 6.6 | 155 ± 10.8 | 161 ± 11.8 | NS |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 94 ± 1.9 | 89.1 ± 4.5 | 98.4 ± 3.4 | 100.8 ± 5.0 | NS |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.04 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | NS |
| ALT (U/L) | 20 ± 0.5 | 38.0 ± 6.2 | 30.7 ± 6.3 | 38.4 ± 5.0 | NS |
| AST (U/L) | 19.6 ± 0.3 | 26.6 ± 3.3 | 25.4 ± 5.1 | 24.0 ± 3.6 | NS |
| ALP (U/L) | 75 ± 6.1 | 87.8 ± 5.5 | 83.7 ± 5.4 | 81.9 ± 5.0 | NS |
| LDH (U/L) | 283 ± 1.9 | 294 ± 11.9 | 311 ± 17.0 | 313 ± 13.0 | NS |
| Hb (g/dL) | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 14.7 ± 0.3 | 14.6 ± 0.3 | 14.7 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Insulin (U/mL) | 8.4 ± 0.9a | 15.1 ± 1.1 | 16.4 ± 4.1 | 10.1 ± 1.1a | <0.01 |
Values are mean ± SEM
ALP alkaline phosphatase, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, DBP diastolic blood pressure, EH essential hypertension, Hb hemoglobin, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, LDL low-density lipoprotein, MAP mean arterial pressure, NC normal control, NS not significant, SBP systolic blood pressure
aVersus untreated EH patients
PMNL-related inflammation and priming and systemic inflammation parameters
| NC | Untreated EH | 1-month treatment | 2-month treatment |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC ×109 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.2a | <0.05 |
| PMNL ×109 | 3.9 ± 0.2a | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.2a | <0.05 |
| PMNL apoptosis (%) | 2.8 ± 0.7a | 15.4 ± 1.8 | 11.5 ± 2.0 | 7.2 ± 1.0a | <0.05 |
| Rate of superoxide release (nmol/106 cells/10 min) | 18.2 ± 1.2 | 29.0 ± 1.6 | 31.7 ± 1.3 | 27.5 ± 1.3b | <0.05 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 289 ± 12.0a | 393 ± 48.0 | 387 ± 34.0 | 367 ± 30.0 | NS |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.6 ± 0.05a | 4.5 ± 0.06 | 4.6 ± 0.07 | 4.6 ± 0.05a | <0.05 |
| Transferrin (g/dL) | 273 ± 5.0a | 288 ± 8.0 | 276 ± 6.0 | 274 ± 7.0 | NS |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.46 ± 0.1a | 3.91 ± 0.9 | 3.04 ± 0.9 | 1.67 ± 0.6a | <0.05 |
Values are mean ± SEM
CRP C-reactive protein, EH essential hypertension, NC normal control, NS not significant, PMNL peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes, WBC white blood cells
aVersus untreated EH patients
bVersus EH patients treated with lercanidipine for 1 month
Fig. 1PMNL apoptosis in whole blood of EH patients before and following 1 and 2 months of lercanidipine treatment. Data are mean ± SEM. a P = 0.001 versus PMNLs from untreated EH patients. EH essential hypertension, PMNL peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes
Fig. 2Serum CRP levels in EH patients before and following 1 and 2 months of lercanidipine treatment. Data are mean ± SEM. a P = 0.001 versus sera from untreated EH patients. CRP C-reactive protein, EH essential hypertension
Fig. 3Serum insulin levels in EH patients before and following 1 and 2 months of lercanidipine treatment. Data are mean ± SEM. a P = 0.004 versus sera from untreated EH patients. EH essential hypertension
Fig. 4Correlation between the rates of superoxide release from separated PMA-stimulated PMNLs and MAP (a); correlation between WBC counts and MAP (b); correlation between PMNL counts and MAP (c). Data refer to values from all EH patients (treated and untreated) and NC subjects (a; n = 106, b and c; n = 109). EH essential hypertension, MAP mean arterial pressure, NC normal control, PMA phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, PMNL peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes, WBC white blood cells
Fig. 5Correlation between plasma fibrinogen levels and MAP (a); correlation between serum CRP levels and MAP (b). Data refer to values from all EH patients (treated and untreated) and NC subjects. (a; n = 101, b; n = 109). CRP C-reactive patients, EH essential hypertension, MAP mean arterial pressure, NC normal control
Fig. 6Correlation between serum insulin levels and MAP. Data refer to values from all EH patients (treated and untreated) and NC subjects (n = 110). EH essential hypertension, MAP mean arterial pressure, NC normal control