| Literature DB >> 25134966 |
Fernanda Schäfer Hackenhaar, Francesca Fumagalli, Giovanni Li Volti, Valeria Sorrenti, Ilaria Russo, Lidia Staszewsky, Serge Masson, Roberto Latini, Giuseppe Ristagno1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reperfusion after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA) is an event that increases reactive oxygen species production leading to oxidative stress. More specifically, myocardial oxidative stress may play a role in the severity of post-CA myocardial dysfunction. This study investigated the relationship between myocardial oxidative stress and post-CA myocardial injury and dysfunction in a rat model of CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 26 rats and was untreated for 6 min. CPR, including mechanical chest compression, ventilation, and epinephrine, was then initiated and continued for additional 6 min prior to defibrillations. Resuscitated animals were sacrificed at two h (n = 9), 4 h (n = 6) and 72 h (n = 8) following resuscitation, and plasma collected for assessment of: high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), as marker of myocardial injury; isoprostanes (IsoP), as marker of lipid peroxidation; and 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHG), as marker of DNA oxidative damage. Hearts were also harvested for measurement of tissue IsoP and 8-OHG. Myocardial function was assessed by echocardiography at the corresponding time points. Additional 8 rats were not subjected to CA and served as baseline controls.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25134966 PMCID: PMC4237821 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-014-0070-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
Resuscitation outcome
| 475 ± 13 | 477 ± 7 | 472 ± 7 | 458 ± 6 | |
| — | 4 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | |
| — | 396 ± 16 | 373 ± 10 | 360 ± 1 |
PR, post resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.
Data shown as mean ± SEM.
Figure 1Hemodynamics. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) at baseline (BL) and post-resuscitation. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. BL.
Figure 2Myocardial function. Left ventricle stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and ejection fraction (EF) at baseline (BL) and post-resuscitation (PR). The bottom table reports data on left ventricle end systolic volume (ESV) and end diastolic volume (EDV). Data are shown as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. BL.
Circulating oxidative stress biomarkers and asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) and dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH)
| 61 [20-91] | 3732 [3277-6218]** | 3469 [2428-4930]* | 44 [39-1610] | |
| 235.6 ± 28.8 | 206.2 ± 14.9 | 306.6 ± 21.6* | 216.6 ± 30.0 | |
| 742.9 ± 79.3 | 1044.5 ± 71.1* | 914.9 ± 104.1 | 846.9 ± 14.7 | |
| 0.146 ± 0.030 | 0.099 ± 0.004 | 0.095 ± 0.013 | 0.136 ± 0.023 | |
| 0.767 ± 0.10 | 0.641 ± 0.07 | 0.468 ± 0.06* | 0.601 ± 0.07 | |
| 0.083 ± 0.01 | 0.052 ± 0.01 | 0.043 ± 0.01 | 0.080 ± 0.02 | |
| 77.5 ± 12.7 | 73.5 ± 7.2 | 79.0 ± 10.4 | 90.0 ± 12.8 |
PR, post resuscitation; 8-OHG, 8-hydroxyguanosine; hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; IsoP, isoprostanes; GSH, glutathione S-transferase.
Parametric data are shown as mean ± SEM; Non-parametric data are shown as median [25-75 percentile].
*p < 0.05 vs. Baseline; **p < 0.01 vs. Baseline.
Figure 3Myocardial isoprostanes vs. myocardial injury and function.Upper: Myocardial isoprostanes (IsoP) levels at baseline (BL) and post resuscitation (PR), reported as mean ± SEM, **p < 0.01 vs. BL. Bottom: relation between IsoP and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF).
Figure 4Myocardial 8-hydroxyguanosine vs. myocardial injury and function.Upper: Myocardial 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHG) levels at baseline (BL) and post resuscitation (PR), reported as mean ± SEM, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 vs. BL. Bottom: relation between 8-OHG and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) and left ventricle ejection fraction (EF).