Literature DB >> 25134033

Advantages and disadvantages of college drinking in students' own words: content analysis of the decisional balance worksheet.

Susan E Collins1, Megan Kirouac1, Emily Taylor1, Philip J Spelman1, Véronique Grazioli1, Gail Hoffman1, Laura Haelsig1, Jessica Holttum1, Ami Kanagawa1, Mayanka Nehru1, Jennifer Hicks1.   

Abstract

The decisional balance worksheet (DBW), an open-ended measure of motivation to change, may be used to record the perceived advantages and disadvantages of substance use as well as alternative behaviors. Recent findings have indicated that the open-ended DBW can be quantified to validly reflect college students' level of motivation to reduce their drinking (Collins, Carey, & Otto, 2009). The goal of the current study was to enhance our understanding of college students' perceived advantages and disadvantages of drinking by qualitatively examining the content of their decisional balance. Participants were undergraduate college students at a 4-year university (N = 760) who participated in a randomized controlled trial of online brief motivational interventions. Using the DBW, participants recorded the advantages and disadvantages of their current drinking. Conventional content analysis methods were used to extract common themes. Social, enjoyment, and psychological reasons were the most commonly mentioned advantages of drinking, whereas physical side effects, expense and interference with goals were the most commonly mentioned disadvantages of drinking. These findings show that college students primarily use alcohol for enjoyment, particularly in social situations, as well as for coping with stress and social anxiety. On the other hand, many college students report having physical side effects from drinking as well as other kinds of concerns (e.g., expense, calories). Findings suggest that using the open-ended DBW may result in a more client-centered and accurate representation of what college students perceive as advantages and disadvantages to drinking than established, Likert-scale measures of decisional balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25134033     DOI: 10.1037/a0036354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  5 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of web-based decisional balance feedback and personalized normative feedback for college drinkers.

Authors:  Susan E Collins; Megan Kirouac; Melissa A Lewis; Katie Witkiewitz; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Safer-drinking strategies used by chronically homeless individuals with alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Véronique S Grazioli; Jennifer Hicks; Greta Kaese; James Lenert; Susan E Collins
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-02-02

3.  Alcohol and social connectedness for new residential university students: implications for alcohol harm reduction.

Authors:  Rachel Brown; Simon Murphy
Journal:  J Furth High Educ       Date:  2018-10-18

4.  Gender Differences in Transdiagnostic Predictors of Problematic Alcohol Consumption in a Large Sample of College Students in Ecuador.

Authors:  Rafael Sánchez-Puertas; Pablo Ruisoto; Carla López-Núñez; Silvia Vaca-Gallegos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Understanding motives for and against hazardous drinking and change among returning veterans.

Authors:  Amy M Schreiner; Nicholas A Livingston; Meagan Heilman; Toby Lynch; Lisa Vittorio; Deborah J Brief; Amy Rubin; Justin L Enggasser; Monica Roy; Marika Solhan; Eric Helmuth; David Rosenbloom; Terence M Keane
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2020-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.