Literature DB >> 25133941

Oxygen Cost of Recreational Horse-Riding in Females.

Louisa Beale1, Neil S Maxwell, Oliver R Gibson, Rosemary Twomey, Becky Taylor, Andrew Church.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize the physiological demands of a riding session comprising different types of recreational horse riding in females.
METHODS: Sixteen female recreational riders (aged 17 to 54 years) completed an incremental cycle ergometer exercise test to determine peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak) and a 45-minute riding session based upon a British Horse Society Stage 2 riding lesson (including walking, trotting, cantering and work without stirrups). Oxygen consumption (VO₂), from which metabolic equivalent (MET) and energy expenditure values were derived, was measured throughout.
RESULTS: The mean VO₂ requirement for trotting/cantering (18.4 ± 5.1 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹; 52 ± 12% VO₂peak; 5.3 ± 1.1 METs) was similar to walking/trotting (17.4 ± 5.1 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹; 48 ± 13% VO₂peak; 5.0 ± 1.5 METs) and significantly higher than for work without stirrups (14.2 ± 2.9 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹; 41 ± 12% VO₂peak; 4.2 ± 0.8 METs) (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The oxygen cost of different activities typically performed in a recreational horse riding session meets the criteria for moderate intensity exercise (3-6 METs) in females, and trotting combined with cantering imposes the highest metabolic demand. Regular riding could contribute to the achievement of the public health recommendations for physical activity in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133941     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  5 in total

1.  Puberal and Adolescent Horse Riders' Fitness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Effects of Training Restrictions on Health-Related and Functional Motor Abilities.

Authors:  Sabrina Demarie; Emanuele Chirico; Cecilia Bratta; Cristina Cortis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Hobbs; Lindsay St George; Janet Reed; Rachel Stockley; Clare Thetford; Jonathan Sinclair; Jane Williams; Kathryn Nankervis; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Self-Assessment of the Pelvic Floor by Women Practicing Recreational Horseback Riding.

Authors:  Monika Urbowicz; Mariola Saulicz; Aleksandra Saulicz; Edward Saulicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Health Benefits and Participation Barriers of Different Level Horseback Riders Age-Wise.

Authors:  Iker Sáez; Patxi León-Guereño; Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko; Eneko Balerdi; Xabier Río; Beñat Lavín; Josu Solabarrieta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Pet Attachment and Wellbeing of Older-Aged Recreational Horseback Riders.

Authors:  Gabriele Schwarzmueller-Erber; Manfred Maier; Michael Kundi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.