Meera Kotagal1, Rebecca G Symons, Irl B Hirsch, Guillermo E Umpierrez, E Patchen Dellinger, Ellen T Farrokhi, David R Flum. 1. *Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), and CHASE Alliance †Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE) ‡Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA §Department of Medicine, Emory University Atlanta, GA ¶Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA ∥Division of Vascular Surgery, Providence Medical Group, Mill Creek, WA **Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), CHASE Alliance, University of Washington ††SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between diabetes status, perioperative hyperglycemia, and adverse events in a statewide surgical cohort. BACKGROUND: Perioperative hyperglycemia may increase the risk of adverse events more significantly in patients without diabetes (NDM) than in those with diabetes (DM). METHODS: Using data from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program, a cohort study (2010-2012) evaluated diabetes status, perioperative hyperglycemia, and composite adverse events in abdominal, vascular, and spine surgery at 53 hospitals in Washington State. RESULTS: Among 40,836 patients (mean age, 54 years; 53.6% women), 19% had diabetes; 47% underwent a perioperative blood glucose (BG) test, and of those, 18% had BG ≥180 mg/dL. DM patients had a higher rate of adverse events (12% vs 9%, P < 0.001) than NDM patients. After adjustment, among NDM patients, those with hyperglycemia had an increased risk of adverse events compared with those with normal BG. Among NDM patients, there was a dose-response relationship between the level of BG and composite adverse events [odds ratio (OR), 1.3 for BG 125-180 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-1.5); OR, 1.6 for BG ≥180 (95% CI, 1.3-2.1)]. Conversely, hyperglycemic DM patients did not have an increased risk of adverse events, including those with a BG 180 or more (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0). NDM patients were less likely to receive insulin at each BG level. CONCLUSIONS: For NDM patients, but not DM patients, the risk of adverse events was linked to hyperglycemia. Underlying this paradoxical effect may be the underuse of insulin, but also that hyperglycemia indicates higher levels of stress in NDM patients than in DM patients.
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between diabetes status, perioperative hyperglycemia, and adverse events in a statewide surgical cohort. BACKGROUND: Perioperative hyperglycemia may increase the risk of adverse events more significantly in patients without diabetes (NDM) than in those with diabetes (DM). METHODS: Using data from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program, a cohort study (2010-2012) evaluated diabetes status, perioperative hyperglycemia, and composite adverse events in abdominal, vascular, and spine surgery at 53 hospitals in Washington State. RESULTS: Among 40,836 patients (mean age, 54 years; 53.6% women), 19% had diabetes; 47% underwent a perioperative blood glucose (BG) test, and of those, 18% had BG ≥180 mg/dL. DMpatients had a higher rate of adverse events (12% vs 9%, P < 0.001) than NDM patients. After adjustment, among NDM patients, those with hyperglycemia had an increased risk of adverse events compared with those with normal BG. Among NDM patients, there was a dose-response relationship between the level of BG and composite adverse events [odds ratio (OR), 1.3 for BG 125-180 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-1.5); OR, 1.6 for BG ≥180 (95% CI, 1.3-2.1)]. Conversely, hyperglycemic DMpatients did not have an increased risk of adverse events, including those with a BG 180 or more (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0). NDM patients were less likely to receive insulin at each BG level. CONCLUSIONS: For NDM patients, but not DMpatients, the risk of adverse events was linked to hyperglycemia. Underlying this paradoxical effect may be the underuse of insulin, but also that hyperglycemia indicates higher levels of stress in NDM patients than in DMpatients.
Authors: J B Meigs; M A Mittleman; D M Nathan; G H Tofler; D E Singer; P M Murphy-Sheehy; I Lipinska; R B D'Agostino; P W Wilson Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-01-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Toralph Ruge; J Andrew Lockton; Frida Renstrom; Theodore Lystig; Valentina Sukonina; Maria K Svensson; Jan W Eriksson Journal: Metabolism Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Margaret A Olsen; Jeffrey J Nepple; K Daniel Riew; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Jennie Mayfield; Victoria J Fraser Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Alexander Kulier; Jack Levin; Rita Moser; Gudrun Rumpold-Seitlinger; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Stephanie A Snyder-Ramos; Patrick Moehnle; Dennis T Mangano Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-07-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rachel Thompson; Sara Khor; Lucas W Thornblade; David R Flum; Michael Sobel Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 2.150