OBJECTIVE: The main purposes of this study were to examine the usefulness of the variables of the theory of planned behavior (viz. attitudes, social norms, and self-efficacy) and to explore the relationship between optimism bias and drink driving in young adults. In addition, we explored gender differences in drink driving with provision for the effect of variables such as driving frequency and alcohol consumption. METHODS: Data were collected via a questionnaire administered to 274 drivers (59.9% females) aged 18-30 years (24.36 ± 2.96). RESULTS: The results obtained with provision for driving frequency revealed substantial differences in driving behaviors between genders. Thus, males were more prone to drink driving, perceived less disapproval by their significant others (parents and peers), and felt less able to avoid drinking-and-driving situations. In addition, they self-reported more frequent alcohol consumption and driving under the influence. The results also confirm the significance of peers' subjective norms and attitudes to drink driving in males. Overconfidence in their own driving skills for driving drunk and perceived behavioral control were found to be significant predictors for drink driving in females. Optimism bias also played a slightly significant role in predicting drink driving but only in females. CONCLUSIONS: The important practical implications of these results with a view to designing effective interventions to prevent the risks associated with drink driving in the young population are discussed. Interventions should focus on young people's perceptions of group norms and promoting cautionary driving choices and alternatives to drink driving.
OBJECTIVE: The main purposes of this study were to examine the usefulness of the variables of the theory of planned behavior (viz. attitudes, social norms, and self-efficacy) and to explore the relationship between optimism bias and drink driving in young adults. In addition, we explored gender differences in drink driving with provision for the effect of variables such as driving frequency and alcohol consumption. METHODS: Data were collected via a questionnaire administered to 274 drivers (59.9% females) aged 18-30 years (24.36 ± 2.96). RESULTS: The results obtained with provision for driving frequency revealed substantial differences in driving behaviors between genders. Thus, males were more prone to drink driving, perceived less disapproval by their significant others (parents and peers), and felt less able to avoid drinking-and-driving situations. In addition, they self-reported more frequent alcohol consumption and driving under the influence. The results also confirm the significance of peers' subjective norms and attitudes to drink driving in males. Overconfidence in their own driving skills for driving drunk and perceived behavioral control were found to be significant predictors for drink driving in females. Optimism bias also played a slightly significant role in predicting drink driving but only in females. CONCLUSIONS: The important practical implications of these results with a view to designing effective interventions to prevent the risks associated with drink driving in the young population are discussed. Interventions should focus on young people's perceptions of group norms and promoting cautionary driving choices and alternatives to drink driving.
Entities:
Keywords:
drink driving; optimism bias; self-efficacy; social norms
Authors: Alexander Tran; Huan Jiang; Shannon Lange; Michael Livingston; Jakob Manthey; Maria Neufeld; Robin Room; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Tadas Telksnys; Janina Petkevičienė; Ričardas Radišauskas; Jürgen Rehm Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Janie Houle; Sophie Meunier; Simon Coulombe; Coralie Mercerat; Isabelle Gaboury; Gilles Tremblay; Francine de Montigny; Lyne Cloutier; Bernard Roy; Nathalie Auger; Brigitte Lavoie Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2017-07-02
Authors: Olalla Cutrín; Isotta Mac Fadden; Stephanie L Ayers; Stephen S Kulis; Jose Antonio Gómez-Fraguela; Flavio F Marsiglia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 3.390