Literature DB >> 25133725

Religious magnanimity: reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat.

Karina Schumann1, Ian McGregor2, Kyle A Nash3, Michael Ross4.   

Abstract

The present research tested the hypothesis that many people's ambient religious beliefs are non-hostile and magnanimous by assessing whether reminding people of their religious belief systems would reduce hostility after threat. Across religious affiliations, participants reported that their religious belief systems encourage magnanimous behavior. In addition, priming their religious belief systems caused them to act more magnanimously, but only when motivated to adhere to salient ideals (i.e., after threats; see Gailliot, Stillman, Schmeichel, Maner, & Plant, 2008; Jonas et al., 2008). Specifically, in Studies 1-5, we found that a general religious belief system prime ("Which religious belief system do you identify with?") reduced the hostility of people's thoughts, behaviors, and judgments following threat. In Studies 6 and 7, we found that the religious belief system prime only reduced hostile reactions to threat among participants who held religious beliefs that oriented them toward magnanimous ideals (Study 6) and who were dispositionally inclined to adhere to their ideals (Study 7). In Study 8, we found support for the role of magnanimous ideals by demonstrating that directly priming these ideals yielded effects similar to those produced by a religious belief system prime. These studies provide consistent evidence that, by invoking magnanimous ideals, a religious belief system prime promotes less hostile responses to threat. 2014 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133725     DOI: 10.1037/a0036739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  4 in total

1.  Political Orientation as Psychological Defense or Basic Disposition? A Social Neuroscience Examination.

Authors:  Kyle Nash; Josh Leota
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: goal regulation theory and a personality × threat × affordance hypothesis.

Authors:  Ian McGregor; Joseph Hayes; Mike Prentice
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Inhibition Underlies the Effect of High Need for Closure on Cultural Closed-Mindedness under Mortality Salience.

Authors:  Dmitrij Agroskin; Eva Jonas; Johannes Klackl; Mike Prentice
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Religion, Social Connectedness, and Xenophobic Responses to Ebola.

Authors:  Roxie Chuang; Kimin Eom; Heejung S Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.