Literature DB >> 25133715

The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics.

John F Rauthmann1, David Gallardo-Pujol2, Esther M Guillaume3, Elysia Todd3, Christopher S Nave4, Ryne A Sherman5, Matthias Ziegler6, Ashley Bell Jones5, David C Funder3.   

Abstract

Taxonomies of person characteristics are well developed, whereas taxonomies of psychologically important situation characteristics are underdeveloped. A working model of situation perception implies the existence of taxonomizable dimensions of psychologically meaningful, important, and consequential situation characteristics tied to situation cues, goal affordances, and behavior. Such dimensions are developed and demonstrated in a multi-method set of 6 studies. First, the "Situational Eight DIAMONDS" dimensions Duty, Intellect, Adversity, Mating, pOsitivity, Negativity, Deception, and Sociality (Study 1) are established from the Riverside Situational Q-Sort (Sherman, Nave, & Funder, 2010, 2012, 2013; Wagerman & Funder, 2009). Second, their rater agreement (Study 2) and associations with situation cues and goal/trait affordances (Studies 3 and 4) are examined. Finally, the usefulness of these dimensions is demonstrated by examining their predictive power of behavior (Study 5), particularly vis-à-vis measures of personality and situations (Study 6). Together, we provide extensive and compelling evidence that the DIAMONDS taxonomy is useful for organizing major dimensions of situation characteristics. We discuss the DIAMONDS taxonomy in the context of previous taxonomic approaches and sketch future research directions. 2014 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133715     DOI: 10.1037/a0037250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  28 in total

1.  Value-based choice: An integrative, neuroscience-informed model of health goals.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Same old, same old? Age differences in the diversity of daily life.

Authors:  Christine Weber; Martin Quintus; Boris Egloff; Gloria Luong; Michaela Riediger; Cornelia Wrzus
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-10-14

3.  The Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study.

Authors:  Ivana Anusic; Richard E Lucas; M Brent Donnellan
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2016-01-16

4.  Virtual Personalities: Using Computational Modeling to Understand Within-Person Variability.

Authors:  Stephen J Read; Benjamin Smith; Vitaliya Droutman; Lynn C Miller
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2016-11-02

5.  Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Teppo Felin; David C Funder; Gerd Gigerenzer; Jan J Koenderink; Joachim I Krueger; Denis Noble; Samuel A Nordli; Mike Oaksford; Barry Schwartz; Keith E Stanovich; Peter M Todd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

6.  From Elementary School to Midlife: Childhood Personality Predicts Behavior During Cognitive Testing over Four Decades Later.

Authors:  Christopher S Nave; Grant W Edmonds; Sarah E Hampson; Theresa Murzyn; Kyle S Sauerberger
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2016-10-08

7.  The Big Five, Everyday Contexts and Activities, and Affective Experience.

Authors:  Joshua Wilt; William Revelle
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2017-12-29

8.  Nostalgia and well-being in daily life: An ecological validity perspective.

Authors:  David B Newman; Matthew E Sachs; Arthur A Stone; Norbert Schwarz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-01-21

9.  Age Differences Across Adulthood in Interpretations of Situations and Situation-Behaviour Contingencies for Big Five States.

Authors:  Erik E Noftle; Charleen J Gust
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2019-06-13

10.  Screenomics: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them.

Authors:  Byron Reeves; Nilam Ram; Thomas N Robinson; James J Cummings; C Lee Giles; Jennifer Pan; Agnese Chiatti; M J Cho; Katie Roehrick; Xiao Yang; Anupriya Gagneja; Miriam Brinberg; Daniel Muise; Yingdan Lu; Mufan Luo; Andrew Fitzgerald; Leo Yeykelis
Journal:  Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.