Literature DB >> 25133564

The rationale for use of Ulipristal Acetate as first line in emergency contraception: biological and clinical evidence.

Anna Glasier1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Ulipristal acetate (UPA) was licensed as an emergency contraceptive (EC) in Europe in 2009. By the end of May 2013, over 1.4 million courses had been used. The rationale for using UPA for EC in favor of the much more commonly used levonorgestrel (LNG) is based on data on efficacy, safety and side effects. EFFICACY: In two large clinical trials among women presenting for EC up to 120 hours after unprotected sex, UPA was as effective as LNG at preventing pregnancy. When the two trials were combined in a meta analysis UPA was superior, almost halving the risk of pregnancy compared with LNG. Biomedical studies have shown that UPA inhibits or delays ovulation more effectively than LNG at a stage of the cycle when the risk of pregnancy is highest. Safety and side effects: UPA and LNG have similar side effect profiles and to date no serious adverse events have been attributed to use of UPA for EC. Data on pregnancies conceived in association with UPA use are reassuring. There is no evidence for teratogenesis or for any increased risk of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage. AVAILABILITY: Use of UPA will remain limited until it is available without a doctor's prescription.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Availability cost; Ulipristal acetate; efficacy; emergency contraception; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133564     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.950645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

1.  "I don't know what I would have done." Women's experiences acquiring ulipristal acetate emergency contraception online from 2011 to 2015.

Authors:  Nicole K Smith; Kelly Cleland; Brandon Wagner; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Proliferation and ovarian hormone signaling are impaired in normal breast tissues from women with BRCA1 mutations: benefit of a progesterone receptor modulator treatment as a breast cancer preventive strategy in women with inherited BRCA1 mutations.

Authors:  Laudine Communal; Myriam Vilasco; Justine Hugon-Rodin; Aurélie Courtin; Najat Mourra; Najiba Lahlou; Morwenna Le Guillou; Muriel Perrault de Jotemps; Marie-Pierre Chauvet; Marc Chaouat; Pascal Pujol; Jean Feunteun; Suzette Delaloge; Patricia Forgez; Anne Gompel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-19

3.  Municipal contraceptive services, socioeconomic status and teenage pregnancy in Finland: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Eerika Jalanko; Frida Gyllenberg; Nikolas Krstic; Mika Gissler; Oskari Heikinheimo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Bridging progestogens in pregnancy and pregnancy prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth Micks; Greta B Raglan; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 5.  Selective progesterone receptor modulators for fertility preservation in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.