Literature DB >> 25133326

Natural course vs interventions to clear common bile duct stones: data from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks).

Mats Möller1, Ulf Gustafsson1, Finn Rasmussen2, Gunnar Persson3, Anders Thorell1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The optimal strategy for common bile duct stones (CBDSs) encountered during cholecystectomy is yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes after various interventional techniques to clear the bile ducts and the natural course of CBDSs found during intraoperative cholangiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a large retrospective cohort analysis, we analyzed data from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks). We included all patients with CBDSs found on intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy from May 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009. EXPOSURES: Presence of CBDSs on intraoperative cholangiography. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relation between strategies for handling CBDSs in terms of complication rates and/or incomplete clearance with need of intervention (ie, unfavorable outcomes).
RESULTS: In 38,864 cholecystectomies, CBDSs were found in 3969 patients, of whom 3828 underwent analysis. Earlier or ongoing symptoms were more common with increasing stone size (P < .001). In total, postoperative unfavorable outcomes were found in 14.9% but less frequently for patients with smaller stones (P < .01). Among patients in whom no intraoperative measures were taken (representing natural course), the risk for unfavorable outcomes was 25.3%. This risk was significantly lower in patients in whom any measure was taken to clear the ducts (12.7%; odds ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.35-0.55]). The same was found when small (<4 mm) and medium (4-8 mm) stones were analyzed separately (odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34-0.79] and 0.24 [95% CI, 0.17-0.32], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The high rates of unfavorable outcomes associated with taking no measures when CBDSs are found during cholecystectomy suggest that the natural course might not be as favorable as earlier suggested. This finding implies that, in general, efforts should be made to clear the bile ducts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25133326     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  19 in total

1.  Natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones and association of endoscopic treatment with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Hakuta; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Yousuke Nakai; Hiroki Oyama; Sachiko Kanai; Tatsunori Suzuki; Tatsuya Sato; Kazunaga Ishigaki; Kei Saito; Tomotaka Saito; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Takeyuki Watadani; Takeshi Tsujino; Minoru Tada; Osamu Abe; Hiroyuki Isayama; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Emilia Pynnönen; Antti Sironen; Eeva Elomaa; Johanna Mrena; Aapo Jalkanen; Mika Nevalainen; Olli Helminen
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-07

3.  Predictors for stone recurrence after a successful common bile duct surgical exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Paula Gonzálvez-Guardiola; Carmen Payá-Llorente; Carlos Domingo-Del Pozo; Aleix Martínez-Pérez
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gearóid Mc Geehan; Conor Melly; Niall O' Connor; Gary Bass; Shahin Mohseni; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  The Outcome of Laparoscopy-Assisted Transgastric Rendezvous ERCP During Cholecystectomy After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Compared to Normal Controls.

Authors:  Sofia Liljegard; Erik Haraldsson; Åsa Fredriksson; Tomas Manke; Anders Kylebäck; Per-Anders Larsson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Intraoperative ERCP for management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ahmed Elgeidie; Ehab Atif; Gamal Elebidy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Removal Between Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Sung Bum Kim; Kook Hyun Kim; Tae Nyeun Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The Treatment of Gallstone Disease.

Authors:  Carsten Gutt; Simon Schläfer; Frank Lammert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Cardiovascular complications after common bile duct stone extractions.

Authors:  Eva-Lena Syrén; Lars Enochsson; Staffan Eriksson; Arne Eklund; Bengt Isaksson; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Hannah M Schutz; Nora D Hallensleben; Abha Bhalla; Robin Timmer; Jeanin E van Hooft; Niels G Venneman; Nicole S Erler; Bart J Veldt; Lydi M J W van Driel; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.