| Literature DB >> 25132992 |
Yasir Jamil Khattak1, Tariq Alam2, Rana Hamid Shoaib1, Raza Sayani1, Tanveer-Ul Haq1, Muhammad Awais1.
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the technical success, safety, and outcome of endovascular embolization procedure in management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms. Materials and Methods. 46 patients were treated for 53 visceral pseudoaneurysms at our institution. Preliminary diagnostic workup in all cases was performed by contrast enhanced abdominal CT scan and/or duplex ultrasound. In all patients, embolization was performed as per the standard departmental protocol. For data collection, medical records and radiology reports of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Technical success, safety, and outcome of the procedure were analyzed. Results. Out of 46 patients, 13 were females and 33 were males. Mean patient age was 44.79 ± 13.9 years and mean pseudoaneurysm size was 35 ± 19.5 mm. Technical success rate for endovascular visceral pseudoaneurysm coiling was 93.47% (n = 43). Complication rate was 6.52% (n = 3). Followup was done for a mean duration of 21 ± 1.6 months (0.5-69 months). Complete resolution of symptoms or improvement in clinical condition was seen in 36 patients (80%) out of those 45 in whom procedure was technically successful. Conclusion. Results of embolization of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms with coils at our center showed high success rate and good short term outcome.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25132992 PMCID: PMC4123623 DOI: 10.1155/2014/258954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-195X
Figure 1Digital subtraction angiogram. (a) Arrow pointing to a large pseudoaneurysm arising from segmental branch of left renal artery supplying the interpolar region. (b) Arrow pointing to a platinum coil deployed in the segmental branch of left renal artery with successful exclusion of pseudoaneurysm.
Figure 2(a) Arrow pointing to pseudoaneurysm arising from branch of gastroduodenal artery. (b) Arrow pointing to platinum coil placed in gastroduodenal artery with successful exclusion of pseudoaneurysm.
Number, size, and anatomical distribution of the aneurysms.
| Artery of origin | Number of aneurysms | Size range |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 53 | |
| Renal | 23 | Range: 4.8–69 mm |
| Hepatic | 14 | Range: 7–44 mm |
| SMA | 2 | Range: 28–36 mm |
| Splenic | 3 | Range: 16–55 mm |
| IMA | 1 | Range: 15 mm |
| Cystic | 1 | Range: 19 mm |
| Celiac | 2 | Range: 43–45 mm |
| Gastroduodenal | 3 | Range: 11–13 mm |
| Pancreaticoduodenal | 1 | Range: 8 mm |
| Left colic | 2 | Range: 6–8.5 mm |
| Middle colic | 1 | Range: 4.5 mm |
Figure 3(a) Pseudoaneurysm arising from left hepatic artery (arrow in Figure 3(a)). (b) Covered stent placed across the site of pseudoaneurysm (arrow in Figure 3(b)). (c) Postcovered stent placement angiogram shows complete exclusion of pseudoaneurysm (arrow in Figure 3(c)).