Andreas Walzer1, Peter Schausberger1. 1. Group of Arthropod Ecology and Behavior, Division of Plant Protection, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter Jordanstrasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
The adaptive canalization hypothesis predicts that highly fitness-relevant traits are canalized via past selection, resulting in low phenotypic plasticity and high robustness to environmental stress. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the level of phenotypic plasticity of male body size of the predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis (low plasticity) and Neoseiulus californicus (high plasticity) reflects the effects of body size variation on fitness, especially male lifetime reproductive success (LRS). We first generated small and standard-sized males of P. persimilis and N. californicus by rearing them to adulthood under limited and ample prey supply, respectively. Then, adult small and standard-sized males were provided with surplus virgin females throughout life to assess their mating and reproductive traits. Small male body size did not affect male longevity or the number of fertilized females but reduced male LRS of P. persimilis but not N. californicus. Proximately, the lower LRS of small than standard-sized P. persimilis males correlated with shorter mating durations, probably decreasing the amount of transferred sperm. Ultimately, we suggest that male body size is more strongly canalized in P. persimilis than N. californicus because deviation from standard body size has larger detrimental fitness effects in P. persimilis than N. californicus.
The adaptive canalization hypothesis predicts that highly fitness-relevant traits are canalized via past selection, resulting in low phenotypic plasticity and high robustness to environmental stress. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the level of phenotypic plasticity of male body size of the predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis (low plasticity) and Neoseiulus californicus (high plasticity) reflects the effects of body size variation on fitness, especially male lifetime reproductive success (LRS). We first generated small and standard-sized males of P. persimilis and N. californicus by rearing them to adulthood under limited and ample prey supply, respectively. Then, adult small and standard-sized males were provided with surplus virgin females throughout life to assess their mating and reproductive traits. Small male body size did not affect male longevity or the number of fertilized females but reduced male LRS of P. persimilis but not N. californicus. Proximately, the lower LRS of small than standard-sized P. persimilis males correlated with shorter mating durations, probably decreasing the amount of transferred sperm. Ultimately, we suggest that male body size is more strongly canalized in P. persimilis than N. californicus because deviation from standard body size has larger detrimental fitness effects in P. persimilis than N. californicus.
Adult male body size is shaped by both natural and sexual selection (Blanckenhorn, 2005) and affects nearly all biological phenomena and ecological events during male life. For example, major behavioural and life-history traits such as age at maturity, feeding and mating habits, susceptibility to predation, competitiveness and longevity are related to male body size (Clutton-Brock, 1988; Roff, 1992; Andersson, 1994). Most importantly, in many species the lifetime reproductive success (LRS) of males is closely correlated with male body size (Andersson, 1994; Blanckenhorn, 2005).Environmental stress triggered by a limited finite, i.e. diminishing, food resource during the juvenile phase commonly decreases body size because selection favours accelerated development enhancing juvenile survival at the expense of smaller body size at maturity (e.g. Abrams et al., 1996). The degree of phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental stress gradients may allow species- and sex-specific predictions of the fitness relevance of adult body size. Potential ultimate explanations for species- and sex-specific plasticities of adult body size can be deduced from the adaptive canalization hypothesis (Waddington, 1942; Schmalhausen, 1949; Stearns & Kawecki, 1994; Stearns, Kaiser & Kawecki, 1995; Stillwell et al., 2010). Traits that are more closely linked to fitness relative to other traits are more strongly affected by selection, which in turn should decrease the phenotypic plasticity of these traits. Consequently, traits under strong past selection are less plastic and more robust to environmental stress, whereas traits under low selection pressure have higher plasticities and are more sensitive to environmental changes (Stillwell et al., 2010). In sexually size-dimorphic species, the level of body size plasticity may reflect the relative importance of body size for reproductive success of males and females within a given species or of different species within a given sex. The predictions of the above-mentioned assumptions, however, were exclusively tested in the context of sexual size dimorphism to detect sex-specific selective forces acting on body size, resulting in different optima in males and females, i.e. intra-locus sexual conflict (Fernandez-Montraveta & Moya-Laraño, 2007; Hallsson & Björklund, 2012; Zhang et al., 2012).The most suitable measure of the fitness relevance of phenotypically plastic traits such as male body size is its effect on male LRS (Grafen, 1982). Measuring male LRS, however, is commonly more laborious and time-consuming than measuring female LRS. Due to widespread polygyny, the former requires the observation of multiple females fertilized during life, whereas the latter requires the observation of only a single female. Additionally, when females are polyandrous, phenomena such as cryptic female choice and sperm competition complicate the exact determination of male LRS. The more difficult determination of male than female LRS is reflected in the strongly female-biased number of topically relevant experimental studies, which is also due to the importance of female LRS as a standard parameter in life table and population growth studies.Here, we investigated the effects of species-specific phenotypic plasticity of male body size on male LRS in the plant-inhabiting predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis (low plasticity) and Neoseiulus californicus (high plasticity) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). These predators constitute natural guilds in several areas of the Mediterranean Basin (De Moraes et al., 2004), sharing the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) as prey (Walzer & Schausberger, 2011). Phytoseiid mites are pseudo-arrhenotokous with haploid males arising from originally diploid eggs (Sabelis, Nagelkerke & Breeuwer, 2002). Females are larger than males (Schulten, 1985) and the tertiary sex ratio is female-biased, ranging from a proportion of 0.6 to 0.8 depending on the environmental conditions (Sabelis & Nagelkerke, 1988). The lifetime mating frequency of males is usually > 10 times higher than that of females (Schulten, 1985). The polygynous males of both species are actively searching for receptive females (Amano & Chant, 1978a; Pappas, Broufas & Koveos, 2005) but nothing is known regarding whether P. persimilis and N. californicus differ in the level of polygyny. Female lifetime mating frequency differs between P. persimilis and N. californicus. A single mating per lifetime is sufficient for maximum egg production of P. persimilis, whereas multiple matings are necessary for N. californicus females (Amano & Chant, 1978b; Gotoh & Tsuchiya, 2008). Phytoseiulus persimilis females may re-mate shortly after the first copulation (Enigl & Schausberger, 2004) but it is unknown whether second mates have any paternity success. Thus, we dub the female mating system of P. persimilis as low-level polyandry and that of N. californicus as medium-level polyandry. As a consequence, the number of receptive females per male (operational sex ratio) is lower in P. persimilis than N. californicus, resulting in fewer lifetime mating opportunities for P. persimilis males, assuming similar male longevities.Based on the adaptive canalization hypothesis and the differing mating systems – low- vs. medium-level polyandry affecting the operational sex ratio – we predicted that male body size has higher fitness relevance in P. persimilis than N. californicus. Deviations from standard body size should be more costly for P. persimilis than N. californicus males, resulting in stronger male body size canalization in the former species. To test our prediction we assessed the LRS and related fitness indicators of small and standard-sized males of P. persimilis and N. californicus.
Materials and Methods
Species origin and rearing
Specimens of P. persimilis and N. californicus used to found laboratory-reared populations originated from Sicily (Walzer & Schausberger, 2011). Both species were reared on separate arenas consisting of plastic tiles resting on water-saturated foam cubes in plastic boxes half-filled with water. The predators were fed in 2- to 3-day intervals with spider mites, T. urticae, reared on whole common bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris. To obtain predator eggs for generating small and standard-sized males and virgin females used in experiments, ten females each of N. californicus and P. persimilis were randomly taken from the rearing units and placed on separate spider mite-infested bean leaf arenas for egg production. Each bean leaf arena (5 × 5 cm) consisted of a detached leaf placed upside down on a water-saturated foam cube in a plastic box half-filled with water. Water-saturated cellulose strips (1 cm height) at the edge of the leaf confined the arena and prevented the mites from escaping.
(Pre-)experimental cages
Cages drilled into rectangular acrylic plates (80 × 35 × 3 mm) were used for generating differently sized males and the mating experiment. The cages used to generate small and standard-sized males of P. persimilis and N. californicus consisted of cylindrical cells of 15 mm diameter and 3 mm height with fine gauze at the bottom and closed on the upper side with a microscope slide (Schausberger, 1997). Cages used for the mating experiment (hereafter termed mating cage) consisted of three interconnected circular cells (two large with 15 mm diameter, one small with 5 mm diameter), closed at the bottom by gauze and covered with a removable microscope slide on the upper side. The two large cells and the small cell were connected by a T-shaped 2-mm-wide aisle (Schausberger & Hoffmann, 2008). The T-shaped arrangement of the mating cage allowed us to release the predatory mites into the cage by opening the small cell while keeping closed the large cells.
Generating small and standard-sized males
To obtain small and standard-sized males of P. persimilis and N. californicus, respectively, eggs were randomly taken from the egg production arenas, singly placed into acrylic cells and provided with either limited (ten for P. persimilis, eight for N. californicus) or ample (> 40) spider mite eggs as prey. Limited prey supply differed between the two predator species because of differing prey needs (Walzer & Schausberger, 2011). The developmental progress of the juveniles was checked every 24 h and their sex determined after reaching adulthood, based on their body size. Virgin males reared under limited and ample prey supply were used as small and standard-sized males, respectively, in the experiment. After the experiment, each male was mounted in a drop of Hoyer's medium on a microscope slide (Krantz & Walter, 2009) and the dorsal shield length, which is a suitable indicator of body size (Croft, Luh & Schausberger, 1999), was measured.
Rearing of virgin females
Groups of 15–20 eggs (< 24 h old) each of P. persimilis and N. californicus were taken from the egg production arenas and placed on separate spider mite-infested leaf arenas. The developmental progress of the juvenile predators was observed twice per day in intervals of 8 and 16 h until reaching adulthood. When the predators were in the deutonymphal stage, the males, identifiable by their small body size, were removed to ensure that, in the end, only virgin females remained on the arena.
Experimental procedure
To start the experiment, one small or one standard-sized male of P. persimilis or N. californicus was placed into a mating cage previously loaded with mixed spider mite life stages serving as prey. For five consecutive days the male was daily provided with four conspecific virgin females. Each set of four females was daily replaced by a new set of four virgin females. To make the four females of a set discernible, they were marked with small water colour dots on their dorsal shields before the experiment. This marking method was successfully used before and did not affect the behaviour of the females (Walzer & Schausberger, 2013). After 5 days of mating, the males were transferred to a cage without conspecific females but with spider mite prey for a 2-day rest period. Then, the males were again placed in a mating cage and daily provided with four virgin females for five consecutive days followed by a 2-day rest period. This 5 days of mating plus 2-day rest procedure was repeated until the males died of natural causes. Male mating behaviour was observed every 30 min within the first 6 h of each day after a set of four virgin females had been added to the mating cage. Males and females were considered mating (copulating sensu stricto) when the male was underneath the female in the venter-to-venter position (Amano & Chant, 1978b). The duration of each mating, occurring during the 6-h observation periods, was recorded. Each species and male body size treatment was replicated ten times. To calculate the LRS of each male, each female was singly placed on a detached spider mite-infested bean leaf arena. Females not laying eggs within 3 days after being caged with a male were considered unfertilized. Eggs daily produced by fertilized females were counted until oviposition ceased. To determine the sex-ratio of offspring sired by each male, the eggs of each female were placed in groups of up to 20 individuals on spider mite-infested leaf arenas and their developmental progress was observed daily. After reaching adulthood the offspring sex was visually determined.
Statistical analyses
SPSS 18.0.1 (SPSS Inc., 2006) was used for all statistical analyses. The data are available as Supporting Information (Table S1). Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to analyse the lifetime traits whereas generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to analyse repeatedly measured traits. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to determine the effects of species and prey availability (limited, ample) on the juvenile survival probabilities (binomial distribution, identity link function) and body size (normal distribution, identity link function) of the males used in the experiments. To detail the effects of prey availability on male body size within and between species, pairs of the estimated marginal means were compared by least significant difference (LSD) tests. Similarly, GLMs (normal distribution, identity link function) were used to analyse the effect of species (P. persimilis, N. californicus) and male body size (small, standard-sized) on adult longevity of the males, total number of fertilized females and fertilized eggs (LRS) by each male, total number of eggs laid by each female (female LRS) and the sex ratio (females/females + males) of offspring sired by each male. GEEs (normal distribution with identity link function, autocorrelation structure between observation days indicating male age) were used to compare the influence of species (P. persimilis, N. californicus), male body size (small, standard-sized) and male age (used as nested within-subject variable) on daily male fertilization success (i.e. the proportion of successfully fertilized females out of the number of females observed mating), daily male reproductive success (number of daily fertilized eggs), daily latency to first mating after presenting the virgin females and daily mean mating duration. The time-dependent parameters were analysed only for the first 3 weeks of the experiment because of the low number of surviving males in the fourth week. To select the most parsimonious GEE model for each parameter, we started with a full model and then stepwise removed non-significant interaction terms. The model with the smallest quasi information criterion value was chosen for analysis (Cui, 2007). All proportional parameters (sex ratio and fertilization success) were arcsin square-root transformed before analyses. Results are given as mean ± SE.
Results
Male body size plasticity, juvenile survival and adult male longevity
GLM revealed that species (Wald χ21 = 10.129, P = 0.001), prey availability (Wald χ21 = 192.300, P < 0.001) and their interaction (Wald χ21 = 5.168, P = 0.023) affected male body size. Phytoseiulus persimilis and N. californicus males provided with ample prey had similar body sizes (P. persimilis: 275.88 ± 1.22 μm; N. californicus: 274.56 ± 1.46 μm; LSD: P = 0.520). In contrast, under limited prey N. californicus males (251.13 ± 0.77 μm) grew smaller than P. persimilis males (259.05 ± 2.27 μm), indicating higher body size plasticity in N. californicus than P. persimilis males (LSD: P < 0.001). Male juvenile survival probabilities were not affected by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 0.361, P = 0.548), prey availability (Wald χ21 = 0.009, P = 0.924) or their interaction (Wald χ21 = 1.417, P = 0.234). Similarly, the longevities of adult P. persimilis and N. californicus males were not influenced by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 0.847, P = 0.357), body size (Wald χ21 = 1.550, P = 0.213) or their interaction (Wald χ21 = 0.237, P = 0.626) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
The influence of species and male body size on LRS, i.e. the lifetime number of fertilized eggs (bars), and longevity (symbols) of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).
The influence of species and male body size on LRS, i.e. the lifetime number of fertilized eggs (bars), and longevity (symbols) of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).
Male and female reproductive success
The total number of fertilized females by each male was affected by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 15.193, P < 0.001) but not male body size (Wald χ21 = 0.184, P = 0.668) or the interaction of species and male body size (Wald χ21 = 0.354, P = 0.552) (Table 1). The daily number of fertilized females was affected by species and male age, but not male body size or the interaction of species and male body size. The effect of species on the daily number of fertilized females depended on male age (Table 2, Fig. 2A, B). Male P. persimilis fertilized more females per day (2.69 ± 0.09) than N. californicus males (1.93 ± 0.09). Older males fertilized fewer females than younger males. Pooled over male body size, the number of females fertilized by N. californicus males decreased continuously with increasing male age, whereas the number of females fertilized by P. persimilis males remained constant until a male age of 5 days and decreased afterwards (Fig. 2A, B). The daily fertilization success of the males was influenced by species and male age, but not male body size or the interaction of male body size and species (Table 2). Phytoseiulus persimilis males had a higher daily fertilization success than N. californicus males and older males had a lower fertilization success than younger males (Fig. 2C, D).
Table 1
The influence of species and male body size on the total number of females fertilized by each male, the female LRS (eggs/female/lifetime) and the sex-ratio of the offspring sired by each male (mean ± SE)
Species
Parameter
Male body size
P. persimilis
N. californicus
Fertilized females
Small
32.60 ± 2.30
22.60 ± 3.84
Standard-sized
35.70 ± 2.87
22.10 ± 3.53
Female LRS
Small
21.50 ± 1·85
13.80 ± 1.32
Standard-sized
31.66 ± 1.91
15.45 ± 1.64
Sex-ratio
Small
0.66 ± 0.05
0.58 ± 0.05
Standard-sized
0.72 ± 0.05
0.66 ± 0.02
Table 2
Generalized estimating equations for the influence of species (P. persimilis, N. californicus), male body size (small, standard-sized) and male age (used as nested within-subject variable) on the daily number of fertilized females and eggs (DRS), the fertilization success, the latency to first mating after presenting the virgin females and the daily mean mating duration of each male
Parameter
Factor
Wald x2
d.f.
P
Fertilized females
Species
17.369
1
< 0.001
Size
0.895
1
0.344
Age
730.242
14
< 0.001
Species × size
0.557
1
0.456
Species (age)
42.924
14
< 0.001
Fertilization success
Species
16.817
1
< 0.001
Size
0.022
1
0.881
Age
164.616
14
< 0.001
Species × size
2.061
1
0.151
DRS
Species
82.126
1
< 0.001
Size
16.464
1
< 0.001
Age
1079.326
14
< 0.001
Species × size
8.565
1
0.003
Species × size (age)
355 107.069
36
< 0.001
Mating latency
Species
36.781
1
< 0.001
Size
0.357
1
0.550
Age
744.721
14
< 0.001
Species × size
3.838
1
0.050
Species × size (age)
2.427E12
38
< 0.001
Mating duration
Species
84.153
1
< 0.001
Size
6.154
1
0.013
Age
394.658
14
< 0.001
Species × size
0.004
1
0.947
Species × size (age)
1.266E12
37
< 0.001
Figure 2
The influence of species (P. persimilis: A, C, E; N. californicus: B, D, F), male body size and male age on the daily number of fertilized females, daily reproductive success (i.e. number of fertilized eggs) and daily fertilization success (i.e. the proportion of fertilized females out of those mated with) of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).
The influence of species (P. persimilis: A, C, E; N. californicus: B, D, F), male body size and male age on the daily number of fertilized females, daily reproductive success (i.e. number of fertilized eggs) and daily fertilization success (i.e. the proportion of fertilized females out of those mated with) of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).The influence of species and male body size on the total number of females fertilized by each male, the female LRS (eggs/female/lifetime) and the sex-ratio of the offspring sired by each male (mean ± SE)Generalized estimating equations for the influence of species (P. persimilis, N. californicus), male body size (small, standard-sized) and male age (used as nested within-subject variable) on the daily number of fertilized females and eggs (DRS), the fertilization success, the latency to first mating after presenting the virgin females and the daily mean mating duration of each maleMale LRS (lifetime number of fertilized eggs) was influenced by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 60.150, P < 0.001), male body size (Wald χ21 = 10.847, P = 0.001) and their interaction (Wald χ21 = 5.915, P = 0.015). Pooled over male body size, P. persimilis males (954.65 ± 85.31) had a higher LRS than N. californicus males (348.75 ± 42.88). Within species, small body size resulted in lower LRS of P. persimilis but not N. californicus (Fig. 1). Male daily reproductive success (DRS) was affected by species, age, body size, and the interaction of species and body size (Fig. 2E, F). Additionally, the species-specific male body size effects changed differently with male age (Table 2). Male DRS was higher in P. persimilis (79.20 ± 4.40) than N. californicus (31.55 ± 2.19) and decreased with male age. Pooled over male age and species, small males had a lower DRS than standard-sized males. However, the interaction terms indicate that male body size affected the DRS of only P. persimilis but not N. californicus. Moreover, the DRS of standard-sized P. persimilis males decreased much more strongly with male age than the DRS of standard-sized N. californicus.Female LRS (number of eggs per female per lifetime) was affected by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 55.176, P < 0.001), male body size (Wald χ21 = 13.464, P = 0.001) and their interaction (Wald χ21 = 6.980, P = 0.008). Pooled over male body size, female LRS of N. californicus was lower than that of P. persimilis. Small male body size reduced the LRS of P. persimilis but not N. californicus females (Table 1).Offspring sex ratio was affected by species (GLM: Wald χ21 = 19.321, P < 0.001) and body size (Wald χ21 = 21.868, P < 0.001) but not their interaction (Wald χ21 = 0.242, P = 0.623). Pooled over body size, the sex ratio of P. persimilis offspring was more female biased than that of N. californicus. In both species, the sex ratio of offspring from small males was less female-biased than that of standard-sized males (Table 1).
Male mating behaviour
Species and male age, but not male body size, influenced the latency to first mating after presenting the virgin females. The interaction term of species and male body size was also significant but this interaction changed with male age (Table 2). Phytoseiulus persimilis males mated earlier than N. californicus males and older males mated later than younger males. Pooled over male age, standard-sized males of P. persimilis but not N. californicus mated later than small males. The differences between standard-sized and small P. persimilis males were mainly caused by the delayed first mating of standard-sized males at the end of the 2nd and 3rd week, respectively. Such a pattern was not observed in N. californicus (Fig. 3A, B).
Figure 3
The influence of species (P. persimilis: A, C; N. californicus: B, D), male body size and male age on the daily mating latency and daily mean mating duration of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).
The influence of species (P. persimilis: A, C; N. californicus: B, D), male body size and male age on the daily mating latency and daily mean mating duration of P. persimilis and N. californicus males (mean ± SE).Species, male body size and male age affected the daily mean male mating duration. Additionally, the interaction of species and male body size depended on male age (Table 2). Neoseiulus californicus males mated for longer (124.94 ± 5.39 min) than P. persimilis males (76.20 ± 1.63 min). Mating duration was negatively correlated with male body size and male age, being shorter in small and old males, respectively. The mating duration of P. persimilis males was almost constant over time but shorter in the small young males up to an age of 8 days. By contrast, the mating duration of young N. californicus males was not affected by body size until an age of 5 days; however, with proceeding age the mating duration of the small males decreased and became shorter than that of standard-sized males (Fig. 3C, D).
Discussion
Our study confirms that male body size plasticity is higher in N. californicus than P. persimilis (Walzer & Schausberger, 2011). Accordingly, prey limitation during juvenile development induced a larger deviation from standard male body size in N. californicus than P. persimilis. Both limited and ample prey regimes allowed similarly high juvenile survival probabilities, excluding any inadvertent bias in body sizes due to size-dependent mortality. If mortality had depended on size, genetically predetermined large individuals could have had lower survival chances under limited prey availability than genetically predetermined small individuals. The observed fitness implications of deviations from standard male body size suggest that the difference in male body size plasticities of P. persimilis and N. californicus is adaptive. Consistent with the predictions of the adaptive canalization hypothesis, deviations from standard male body size were linked to high fitness costs in P. persimilis (low plasticity) but not N. californicus males (high plasticity), resulting in lower LRS of small than standard-sized males of P. persimilis but not N. californicus. We suggest that lower male body size plasticity in P. persimilis than N. californicus is the result of stronger past sexual selection, making this highly fitness-relevant trait more robust to environmental disturbance (Stearns & Kawecki, 1994; Walzer & Schausberger, 2011).
Species-specific male reproductive success
Pooled over male body sizes, male LRS of P. persimilis was about three times higher than that of N. californicus. As in most sexually reproducing animals, paternal investment in offspring by P. persimilis and N. californicus is insignificant relative to maternal investment. Male reproductive success is mainly a function of the number of matings (e.g. Trivers, 1972). Indeed, the fertilization success (number of fertilized females out of the number of mated females) and the total number of fertilized females were significantly higher in P. persimilis than N. californicus males. Sperm quality, which is a decisive factor for the fertilization success in single pair matings (Levitan, 2000; Kime et al., 2001), could have been higher in P. persimilis than N. californicus males. Alternatively or additionally, lower male LRS of N. californicus could have been due to a lower quantity of sperm transferred per mating, as indicated by the lower number of fertilized eggs per single mating in N. californicus than P. persimilis.
Species-specific male body size effects on reproductive success
Proximately, various physiological and/or behavioural constraints may have caused the body size-dependent LRS of P. persimilis males, as compared with the body size-independent LRS of N. californicus males. In general, being smaller than standard may reduce male reproductive lifespan (Jennions, Moller & Petrie, 2001), which in turn often results in lower LRS of small males (Clutton-Brock, 1988). In our experiments, however, the longevities of small and standard-sized P. persimilis males were similar and independent of their body size.The mating latency of standard-sized P. persimilis males was longer than that of small males, which may indicate either that sperm regeneration depended on body size (Sato et al., 2005), taking longer in standard-sized males, or that females were more reluctant to mate with standard-sized than small males, or that standard-sized males needed longer than small males to locate receptive females. However, prolonged mating latency falls short as an explanation for male body size effects on LRS because the fertilization success (number of fertilized females out of the number of mated females) of P. persimilis males did not depend on their body size.Sperm quantity is considered to be a function of male body size (Fox, McLennan & Mousseau, 1995; Schlüns et al., 2003), and mating duration is an appropriate indicator of the amount of transferred sperm in several species (e.g. Arnqvist & Danielsson, 1999; Wilder & Rypstra, 2007), including P. persimilis and N. californicus (Amano & Chant, 1978a; Gotoh & Tsuchiya, 2008). In contrast to N. californicus, the mating duration of young small P. persimilis males was significantly shorter than that of young standard-sized males within the first week, where more than half of all offspring were sired by the P. persimilis males. The number of descendants of small P. persimilis males was about 40% lower than that of standard-sized males during this time period, indicating that short mating duration correlated with a low amount of transferred sperm. Three non-exclusive reasons may have shortened the mating duration of small P. persimilis males. First, small males may have finished mating earlier than standard-sized males because they were exhausted sooner or had a lower amount of sperm material available. If so, the size of the spermatophores transferred to females in single pairings should be positively correlated with male body size, as documented for bush crickets, seed beetles and leaf beetles (Wedell, 1997; French & Hammack, 2012). This needs further investigation for P. persimilis. Second, large male body size is a common indicator of high male quality (Andersson, 1994). Females may have finished mating with smaller males earlier than with standard-sized males, allowing re-mating and thus opening the chance for sperm competition. Third, mating events involving small males could have been disturbed more strongly by the other females than matings involving standard-sized males. Irrespective of male body size, the mating couples were frequently surrounded by the other females, apparently shortening the mating duration compared with matings in the absence of other females (Enigl & Schausberger, 2004; Gotoh & Tsuchiya, 2008). If small males were less vigorous than standard-sized males, interference by the other females could have been more severe in mating couples involving small males, shortening their mating duration.
Male body size effects on offspring sex-ratio
In both P. persimilis and N. californicus small male body size reduced the proportion of female offspring. Proximately, sex-specific offspring mortality may have lowered the proportion of daughters among offspring fathered by small males. Daughters are larger than sons and the larger sex is often more strongly affected by adverse parental effects (Nylin & Gotthard, 1998; Walzer & Schausberger, 2013). Paternal effects may have negative sex-specific effects on offspring survival. For example, in male Plodia interpunctella moths, food limitation during development resulted in reduced sex-specific offspring immunity: sons had a lower immune reaction than daughters in resource-rich environments, whereas the reverse was true in resource-poor environments (Triggs & Knell, 2012). The proportion of daughters is also positively correlated with total oviposition in phytoseiid mites (Sabelis & Nagelkerke, 1988; Sabelis et al., 2002). Mating with small males reduced the total number of eggs produced by P. persimilis but not N. californicus females. Possibly, female eggs of P. persimilis were disproportionally negatively affected by oviposition reduction because they are more costly to produce than male eggs (Nagelkerke & Sabelis, 1998). Phytoseiulus persimilis females are able to precisely adjust the offspring sex-ratio to environmental conditions (Sabelis & Nagelkerke, 1988; Nagelkerke & Sabelis, 1998). More favourable conditions such as ample food supply correlate with higher female proportions among offspring (Friese & Gilstrap, 1982). If male body size of P. persimilis and N. californicus is an indicator of mate quality, a maternally decreased proportion of daughters could reduce the transfer of paternally induced detrimental effects such as epigenetic marks to the filial generation because only diploid daughters carry the paternal genome.
Conclusions
Our results correspond to observations of life-history plasticity in other arthropods such as water striders (Fairbairn, 2005), fruit flies (Stearns et al., 1995) and spiders (Fernandez-Montraveta & Moya-Laraño, 2007): the lower the phenotypic plasticity of a given trait, the higher its fitness relevance. Such canalization is considered adaptive because it buffers fitness-relevant traits against environmental perturbations, preventing large deviations from trait optimum (Stillwell et al., 2010). Most studies, however, evaluated sex-specific effects on plasticity of life-history traits to explain the evolution of sexual size dimorphism (Stillwell et al., 2010). Our study provides a key example of possible linkages between body size plasticity and species-specific mating systems (low- versus medium-level polyandry). Male body size had higher fitness relevance in the low-level polyandrous P. persimilis, resulting in stronger canalization of male body size, than in the medium-level polyandrous N. californicus. It is likely, but needs yet to be shown, that male body size is also more important in male competition and female choice in P. persimilis than N. californicus.
Authors: D E Kime; K J Van Look; B G McAllister; G Huyskens; E Rurangwa; F Ollevier Journal: Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.228