F Schwendicke1, M Kern2, U Blunck3, C Dörfer4, J Drenck4, S Paris3. 1. Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: falk.schwendicke@charite.de. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany. 3. Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Selective caries removal involves sealing of carious dentine beneath restorations, which might decrease their marginal integrity and increase the susceptibility for secondary caries and microleakage. The present study compared these marginal characteristics of restorations in selectively and completely excavated teeth. METHODS: In 32 premolars, shallow and deep artificial lesions were created on pulpo-axial walls of mesial-distal-occlusal cavities, with mesial and distal margins located in enamel and dentine, respectively. Demineralised dentine was either removed or left before adhesively restoring the teeth (n=8), which were then submitted to thermo-mechanical cycling. The integrity of gingivo-cervical margins was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. In half of each margin, caries was induced adjacent to restorations using a continuous-culture biofilm model, and resulting lesions were evaluated using transversal microradiography. The other half of each margin was used to assess microleakage. RESULTS: Integrity or microleakage of margins located in enamel did not differ significantly between groups, and bacterial biofilms did not induce distinct caries lesions in enamel. Dentinal margins in teeth with deep compared with shallow lesions showed a significantly higher proportion of marginal imperfections, gaps and microleakage (p≤0.05, Mann-Whitney/χ(2)-test). In contrast, neither marginal integrity nor microleakage differed significantly between completely and selectively excavated teeth (p>0.05). Dentinal mineral loss adjacent to restorations did not differ significantly between groups (p>0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal characteristics of restorations were affected by the depth of sealed or excavated lesions, but not by the performed caries excavation. This study did not find selective excavation detrimental for restoration integrity in vitro. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Selective excavation of deep lesions was shown to reduce pulpal risks, whilst leaving caries beneath restorations is feared to compromise the marginal characteristics of the subsequently placed restoration. Based on the present in vitro study, such assumptions cannot be supported.
OBJECTIVES: Selective caries removal involves sealing of carious dentine beneath restorations, which might decrease their marginal integrity and increase the susceptibility for secondary caries and microleakage. The present study compared these marginal characteristics of restorations in selectively and completely excavated teeth. METHODS: In 32 premolars, shallow and deep artificial lesions were created on pulpo-axial walls of mesial-distal-occlusal cavities, with mesial and distal margins located in enamel and dentine, respectively. Demineralised dentine was either removed or left before adhesively restoring the teeth (n=8), which were then submitted to thermo-mechanical cycling. The integrity of gingivo-cervical margins was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. In half of each margin, caries was induced adjacent to restorations using a continuous-culture biofilm model, and resulting lesions were evaluated using transversal microradiography. The other half of each margin was used to assess microleakage. RESULTS: Integrity or microleakage of margins located in enamel did not differ significantly between groups, and bacterial biofilms did not induce distinct caries lesions in enamel. Dentinal margins in teeth with deep compared with shallow lesions showed a significantly higher proportion of marginal imperfections, gaps and microleakage (p≤0.05, Mann-Whitney/χ(2)-test). In contrast, neither marginal integrity nor microleakage differed significantly between completely and selectively excavated teeth (p>0.05). Dentinal mineral loss adjacent to restorations did not differ significantly between groups (p>0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal characteristics of restorations were affected by the depth of sealed or excavated lesions, but not by the performed caries excavation. This study did not find selective excavation detrimental for restoration integrity in vitro. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Selective excavation of deep lesions was shown to reduce pulpal risks, whilst leaving caries beneath restorations is feared to compromise the marginal characteristics of the subsequently placed restoration. Based on the present in vitro study, such assumptions cannot be supported.
Authors: José R Lino; Joana Ramos-Jorge; Valéria Silveira Coelho; Maria L Ramos-Jorge; Marcos R Moysés; José C R Ribeiro Journal: Int Dent J Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Falk Schwendicke; Soraya Leal; Peter Schlattmann; Sebastian Paris; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Marta Gomes Marques; Leandro Augusto Hilgert Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 2.692