BACKGROUND: Drug survival (time to drug discontinuation) has recently emerged as an important parameter reflecting the long-term therapeutic performance in a real-life setting. Biologic drug survival in psoriasis is mainly limited by a gradual loss of efficacy over time. Previous studies have been limited by small patient population size and short observation times and yielded discrepant survival times for different biologics. OBJECTIVES: To calculate the long-term drug survival for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab in a large cohort of real-life patients with psoriasis vulgaris and to analyse the factors that influence drug survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the prospective registry DERMBIO covering all patients with psoriasis vulgaris treated with biologic agents in the academic centres in Denmark. Drug survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The influence of different covariates on drug survival was analysed by Cox regression. RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 1867 treatment series (adalimumab n = 774, etanercept n = 449, infliximab n = 253, ustekinumab n = 391) administered in 1277 patients for up to 10 years. Drug survival was significantly longer for ustekinumab than for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents (P < 0·001). Etanercept had the shortest survival time [median survival 30 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25·1-34·9] whereas adalimumab and infliximab had comparable survival rates (59 months, 95% CI 45·6-72·4; 44 months, 95% CI 33-54·9, respectively). Survival was longer in men [odds ratio (OR) 1·51, 95% CI 1·31-1·74 vs. women] and in patients who had not previously received any biologic agent (OR 1·24, 95% CI 1·05-1·46). Loss of efficacy accounted for 67% of all drug discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab has a significantly longer drug survival than the anti-TNF-α agents. Switching from one biologic to another is associated with an impairment of drug survival. Preventing loss of efficacy is a major area of medical need in the biologic therapy of psoriasis and the strategies that improve drug survival should be further investigated.
BACKGROUND: Drug survival (time to drug discontinuation) has recently emerged as an important parameter reflecting the long-term therapeutic performance in a real-life setting. Biologic drug survival in psoriasis is mainly limited by a gradual loss of efficacy over time. Previous studies have been limited by small patient population size and short observation times and yielded discrepant survival times for different biologics. OBJECTIVES: To calculate the long-term drug survival for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab in a large cohort of real-life patients with psoriasis vulgaris and to analyse the factors that influence drug survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the prospective registry DERMBIO covering all patients with psoriasis vulgaris treated with biologic agents in the academic centres in Denmark. Drug survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The influence of different covariates on drug survival was analysed by Cox regression. RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 1867 treatment series (adalimumab n = 774, etanercept n = 449, infliximab n = 253, ustekinumab n = 391) administered in 1277 patients for up to 10 years. Drug survival was significantly longer for ustekinumab than for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents (P < 0·001). Etanercept had the shortest survival time [median survival 30 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25·1-34·9] whereas adalimumab and infliximab had comparable survival rates (59 months, 95% CI 45·6-72·4; 44 months, 95% CI 33-54·9, respectively). Survival was longer in men [odds ratio (OR) 1·51, 95% CI 1·31-1·74 vs. women] and in patients who had not previously received any biologic agent (OR 1·24, 95% CI 1·05-1·46). Loss of efficacy accounted for 67% of all drug discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS:Ustekinumab has a significantly longer drug survival than the anti-TNF-α agents. Switching from one biologic to another is associated with an impairment of drug survival. Preventing loss of efficacy is a major area of medical need in the biologic therapy of psoriasis and the strategies that improve drug survival should be further investigated.
Authors: N D Loft; L Skov; L Iversen; R Gniadecki; T N Dam; I Brandslund; H J Hoffmann; M R Andersen; R B Dessau; A C Bergmann; N M Andersen; P S Andersen; S Bank; U Vogel; V Andersen Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Laura M Sawyer; David Wonderling; Karina Jackson; Ruth Murphy; Eleanor J Samarasekera; Catherine H Smith Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: April W Armstrong; J Will Koning; Simon Rowse; Huaming Tan; Carla Mamolo; Mandeep Kaur Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Ji Sun van Bezooijen; Deepak M W Balak; Martijn B A van Doorn; Caspar W N Looman; Marco W J Schreurs; Birgit C P Koch; Teun van Gelder; Errol P Prens Journal: Dermatology Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.366
Authors: Richard B Warren; Catherine H Smith; Zenas Z N Yiu; Darren M Ashcroft; Jonathan N W N Barker; A David Burden; Mark Lunt; Kathleen McElhone; Anthony D Ormerod; Caroline M Owen; Nick J Reynolds; Christopher E M Griffiths Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Jalpa A Doshi; Junko Takeshita; Lionel Pinto; Penxiang Li; Xinyan Yu; Preethi Rao; Hema N Viswanathan; Joel M Gelfand Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 11.527