Literature DB >> 25132113

Quantification of the statistical effects of spatiotemporal processing of nontask FMRI data.

Muge Karaman1, Andrew S Nencka, Iain P Bruce, Daniel B Rowe.   

Abstract

Nontask functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become one of the most popular noninvasive areas of brain mapping research for neuroscientists. In nontask fMRI, various sources of "noise" corrupt the measured blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. Many studies have aimed to attenuate the noise in reconstructed voxel measurements through spatial and temporal processing operations. While these solutions make the data more "appealing," many commonly used processing operations induce artificial correlations in the acquired data. As such, it becomes increasingly more difficult to derive the true underlying covariance structure once the data have been processed. As the goal of nontask fMRI studies is to determine, utilize, and analyze the true covariance structure of acquired data, such processing can lead to inaccurate and misleading conclusions drawn from the data if they are unaccounted for in the final connectivity analysis. In this article, we develop a framework that represents the spatiotemporal processing and reconstruction operations as linear operators, providing a means of precisely quantifying the correlations induced or modified by such processing rather than by performing lengthy Monte Carlo simulations. A framework of this kind allows one to appropriately model the statistical properties of the processed data, optimize the data processing pipeline, characterize excessive processing, and draw more accurate functional connectivity conclusions.

Keywords:  brain connectivity; correlation matrix; image reconstruction; nontask fMRI; spatiotemporal processing; statistics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132113      PMCID: PMC4238310          DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Connect        ISSN: 2158-0014


  29 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR.

Authors:  G H Glover; T Q Li; D Ress
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A new statistical approach to detecting significant activation in functional MRI.

Authors:  J L Marchini; B D Ripley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Valeria Della-Maggiore; Wilkin Chau; Pedro R Peres-Neto; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Single-shot magnetic field mapping embedded in echo-planar time-course imaging.

Authors:  Vinai Roopchansingh; Robert W Cox; Andrzej Jesmanowicz; B Douglas Ward; James S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The evaluation of preprocessing choices in single-subject BOLD fMRI using NPAIRS performance metrics.

Authors:  Stephen LaConte; Jon Anderson; Suraj Muley; James Ashe; Sally Frutiger; Kelly Rehm; Lars Kai Hansen; Essa Yacoub; Xiaoping Hu; David Rottenberg; Stephen Strother
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael D Greicius; Ben Krasnow; Allan L Reiss; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evaluating subject specific preprocessing choices in multisubject fMRI data sets using data-driven performance metrics.

Authors:  Marnie E Shaw; Stephen C Strother; Maria Gavrilescu; Katherine Podzebenko; Anthony Waites; John Watson; Jon Anderson; Graeme Jackson; Gary Egan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?

Authors:  L T Hu; P M Bentler; Y Kano
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  4 in total

1.  Double-wavelet transform for multisubject task-induced functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Minchun Zhou; David Badre; Hakmook Kang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Incorporating relaxivities to more accurately reconstruct MR images.

Authors:  Muge Karaman; Iain P Bruce; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  COMPLEX-VALUED TIME SERIES MODELING FOR IMPROVED ACTIVATION DETECTION IN FMRI STUDIES.

Authors:  Daniel W Adrian; Ranjan Maitra; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Oscar Esteban; Christopher J Markiewicz; Ross W Blair; Craig A Moodie; A Ilkay Isik; Asier Erramuzpe; James D Kent; Mathias Goncalves; Elizabeth DuPre; Madeleine Snyder; Hiroyuki Oya; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jessey Wright; Joke Durnez
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 28.547

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.