Literature DB >> 25131984

Incidence, management, and prevention of right ventricular perforation by pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Federico Migliore1, Alessandro Zorzi, Emanuele Bertaglia, Loira Leoni, Mariachiara Siciliano, Manuel De Lazzari, Barbara Ignatiuk, Marta Veronese, Roberto Verlato, Giuseppe Tarantini, Sabino Iliceto, Domenico Corrado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac perforation of the right ventricle (RV) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of both pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant. Appropriate management is still uncertain. We assessed the incidence of subacute (24 hours-1 month) or delayed (>1 month) cardiac perforation by RV lead and the results of percutaneous lead extraction.
METHOD: The study population included all patients diagnosed with subacute or delayed RV-lead perforation during the period 2007-2013. The incidence of perforation according to device type and fixation mechanism was calculated. The outcome of the percutaneous approach, consisting of lead extraction by simple traction, was assessed.
RESULTS: Cardiac perforation was diagnosed in 14 (eight females, mean age 71 [range 47-83] years) patients out of 3,815 who received an RV-lead implant (0.4%). The overall incidence of RV-lead perforation was similar between ICD (0.3%) and PM (0.4%) implants (P = 1.0) and between active (0.5%) and passive (0.3%) fixation leads (P = 0.3). All perforating leads were originally placed at the RV apex. Five patients were asymptomatic, but all presented altered lead electrical parameters. Surgical removal of the lead was performed in one patient while in the remaining the leads were successfully extracted by direct manual traction in the absence of any complications. In all patients, new active fixation leads were positioned in the RV septum and the follow-up (42 ± 27 months) was uneventful.
CONCLUSIONS: RV perforation is a rare complication of both PM and ICD implants, regardless of the lead fixation mechanism. In most patients, percutaneous lead extraction is a safe and effective management approach. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac perforation; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; lead extraction; lead failure; pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25131984     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  20 in total

1.  Pleural Effusion Secondary to Atrial Perforation During COVID-19 Period.

Authors:  Eduardo Laviña Soriano; Yunelsy Anta Mejías; Lucía Gil Abadía; Olga Mediano
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Cardiac Tamponade after Removal of a Temporary Pacing Wire for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ying-Hsiang Wang; Hung-Yen Ke; Cheng-Chung Cheng; Tzu-Chiao Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai; Chih-Yuan Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  Complications in Device Therapy: Spectrum, Prevalence, and Management.

Authors:  J Llewellyn; D Garner; A Rao
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Perforation of myocardial wall and great vessels after cardiovascular interventions-a 5-year analysis.

Authors:  Zdenek Provaznik; Andreas Holzamer; Daniele Camboni; Leopold Rupprecht; Markus Resch; Sigrid Wittmann; Christof Schmid; Bernhard Floerchinger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Reversibility of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block with Revascularization in Coronary Artery Disease without Infarction: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Rhanderson Cardoso; Carlos E Alfonso; James O Coffey
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

6.  Missed diagnosis: Dual right ventricular lead perforation resulting in chest pain.

Authors:  Daniel W Nelson; Caroline Vloka; Jule Wetherbee
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

7.  Delayed right ventricular defibrillation lead perforation presenting as cardiac tamponade and treated surgically.

Authors:  Masahiko Noguchi; Toshiko Nakai; Yuji Kawano; Kentaro Shibayama; Kotaro Obunai; Minoru Tabata; Hiroyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Complications of Cardiac Perforation and Lead Dislodgement with an MRI-Conditional Pacing Lead: a Korean Multi-Center Experience.

Authors:  Chang Hee Kwon; Jin Hee Choi; Jun Kim; Uk Jo; Ji Hyun Lee; Woo Seok Lee; Yoo Ri Kim; Soo Yong Lee; Ki Won Whang; Jihyun Yang; Sung Hwan Kim; Yong Seog Oh; Kyoung Min Park; Gi Byoung Nam; Kee Joon Choi; You Ho Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Delayed right ventricular perforation complicated by intracardiac thrombosis after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ito; Toshihiko Goto; Yu Kawada; Nobuyuki Ohte
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-12-15

10.  Chronic Apical and Nonapical Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with High-Grade Atrioventricular Block: Results of the Right Pace Study.

Authors:  Carmine Muto; Valeria Calvi; Giovanni Luca Botto; Domenico Pecora; Daniele Porcelli; Alessandro Costa; Gianfranco Ciaramitaro; Riccardo Airò Farulla; Anna Rago; Raimondo Calvanese; Marco Tullio Baratto; Albino Reggiani; Massimo Giammaria; Santina Patané; Monica Campari; Sergio Valsecchi; Giampiero Maglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.