Federico Gobbi1, Chiara Postiglione2, Andrea Angheben3, Stefania Marocco3, Geraldo Monteiro3, Dora Buonfrate3, Marta Mascarello4, Maria Gobbo3, Michel Boussinesq5, Zeno Bisoffi3. 1. Center for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: federico.gobbi@sacrocuore.it. 2. Prevention Department, ULSS 20 Verona, Verona, Italy. 3. Center for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. Electronic address: martamasca@yahoo.it. 5. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier, France. Electronic address: michel.boussinesq@ird.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: loiasis is a neglected filariasis, affecting millions of individuals living in the rainforest areas of West and Central Africa. Aim of this study was to compare clinical and parasitological manifestations of loiasis between subjects born in endemic areas and expatriates/travelers. METHODS: we report clinical and parasitological manifestations of 100 patients with imported loiasis seen between 1993 and 2013 at the Center of Tropical Diseases, Negrar, Italy. RESULTS: among the 100 patients, 30 were African immigrants, 70 were Europeans (59 long-term expatriates and 11 travelers). Thirty-five patients (19 Africans and 16 Europeans) had positive microfilaremia. Calabar swellings were twice as frequent in Europeans (90%) than in Africans (46.7%), while a history of "eyeworm" was recorded in a higher proportion of Africans (43.3%) than in Europeans (17.4%). The median duration of exposure in the non-endemic group was also fairly long (14.6 years). Different drug regimens were used for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: we suggest that the differences between Africans and Europeans are more likely to be related to genetic differences, rather than to chronicity. Moreover the management of imported loiasis needs standardization.
BACKGROUND:loiasis is a neglected filariasis, affecting millions of individuals living in the rainforest areas of West and Central Africa. Aim of this study was to compare clinical and parasitological manifestations of loiasis between subjects born in endemic areas and expatriates/travelers. METHODS: we report clinical and parasitological manifestations of 100 patients with imported loiasis seen between 1993 and 2013 at the Center of Tropical Diseases, Negrar, Italy. RESULTS: among the 100 patients, 30 were African immigrants, 70 were Europeans (59 long-term expatriates and 11 travelers). Thirty-five patients (19 Africans and 16 Europeans) had positive microfilaremia. Calabar swellings were twice as frequent in Europeans (90%) than in Africans (46.7%), while a history of "eyeworm" was recorded in a higher proportion of Africans (43.3%) than in Europeans (17.4%). The median duration of exposure in the non-endemic group was also fairly long (14.6 years). Different drug regimens were used for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: we suggest that the differences between Africans and Europeans are more likely to be related to genetic differences, rather than to chronicity. Moreover the management of imported loiasis needs standardization.
Authors: Makoto Saito; Margaret Armstrong; Samuel Boadi; Patricia Lowe; Peter L Chiodini; Tom Doherty Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sabino Puente; German Ramírez-Olivencia; Mar Lago; Mercedes Subirats; Francisco Bru; Eugenio Pérez-Blazquez; Marta Arsuaga; Concepción Ladron de Guevara; Fernando de la Calle-Prieto; Belén Vicente; Montserrat Alonso-Sardón; Moncef Belhassen-Garcia; Antonio Muro Journal: Infect Dis Poverty Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 4.520
Authors: Kevin G Buell; Charles Whittaker; Cédric B Chesnais; Paul D Jewell; Sébastien D S Pion; Martin Walker; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Michel Boussinesq Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.835