C Santos1, R Costa2, J Malheiro2, S Pedroso2, M Almeida2, L S Martins2, L Dias2, S Tafulo3, A C Henriques2, A Cabrita2. 1. Nephrology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: mclaracsantos@gmail.com. 2. Nephrology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Porto, Porto, Portugal. 3. Centro Histocompatibilidade Norte, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, with improved mortality and quality of life compared with dialysis. Desensitization protocols have allowed kidney transplantation of highly sensitized patients, who have a lower probability to receive a matching kidney from a deceased or living donor. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-transplantation period of highly HLA-sensitized patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch against donor cells. METHODS: Following an observational, retrospective design, we investigated 16 highly sensitized patients who underwent kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation, assessing the impact of desensitization protocols and investigating treatment-related complications, graft function, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rate, and graft and patient survivals. RESULTS: We studied 16 patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch, who were divided into 2 groups based on whether they were submitted to a desensitization protocol or not. Patients who were desensitized underwent transplantation in later years, had higher immunologic risk (panel reactive antibody peak 62% vs 33%; P = .038), higher percentage of 2nd kidney transplant (75% vs 25%; P = .066), and higher percentage of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies identified (P = .028). A majority of patients were desensitized with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, and 5 patients received rituximab. Acute AMR rate was of 38%, and rituximab was associated with fewer episodes of AMR. Only 1 patient had graft failure, due to chronic humoral rejection, and the remaining maintained good graft function (mean serum creatinine value of 1.33 mg/dL). No patient died and few complications related to immunossupression were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization protocols were safe and allowed kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients that probably would never undergo transplantation and gave the opportunity of living-donor transplant to patients with anti-HLA antibodies against the donor.
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, with improved mortality and quality of life compared with dialysis. Desensitization protocols have allowed kidney transplantation of highly sensitized patients, who have a lower probability to receive a matching kidney from a deceased or living donor. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-transplantation period of highly HLA-sensitized patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch against donor cells. METHODS: Following an observational, retrospective design, we investigated 16 highly sensitized patients who underwent kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation, assessing the impact of desensitization protocols and investigating treatment-related complications, graft function, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rate, and graft and patient survivals. RESULTS: We studied 16 patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch, who were divided into 2 groups based on whether they were submitted to a desensitization protocol or not. Patients who were desensitized underwent transplantation in later years, had higher immunologic risk (panel reactive antibody peak 62% vs 33%; P = .038), higher percentage of 2nd kidney transplant (75% vs 25%; P = .066), and higher percentage of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies identified (P = .028). A majority of patients were desensitized with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, and 5 patients received rituximab. Acute AMR rate was of 38%, and rituximab was associated with fewer episodes of AMR. Only 1 patient had graft failure, due to chronic humoral rejection, and the remaining maintained good graft function (mean serum creatinine value of 1.33 mg/dL). No patient died and few complications related to immunossupression were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization protocols were safe and allowed kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients that probably would never undergo transplantation and gave the opportunity of living-donor transplant to patients with anti-HLA antibodies against the donor.