Literature DB >> 25130725

Comparison of plasma exchange performances between Spectra Optia and COBE Spectra apheresis systems in repeated procedures considering variability and using specific statistical models.

O Hequet1, V Stocco2, S Assari3, P Drillat3, Q H Le4, A Kassir5, D Rigal5, R Bouzgarrou6.   

Abstract

Repeated therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures using centrifugation techniques became a standard therapy in some diseases. As the new device Spectra Optia (SPO; Terumo BCT) was available, we studied its performances in repeated procedures in 20 patients in three apheresis units. First we analysed the performance results obtained by SPO. Second we compared the performances of the SPO device to a standard device, COBE Spectra (CSP; Terumo BCT) in the same patients using statistical method of mixed effects linear regression that considers variability between patients, centres and apheresis procedures. The performances analysed were classified according to plasma removal performances and their consequences on patients whose blood disturbances were assessed. Primary outcome was plasma removal efficiency (PRE) and PRE-anticoagulant corrected which was a more accurate parameter. Secondary outcomes corresponded to the volume of ACD-A consumed, platelets content in waste bag, procedure duration and status of coagulation system observed after TPE sessions. Before comparing the performances of both devices we compared the plasma volumes (PVs) processed in both techniques which showed that the PVs processed in SPO procedures were lower than in CSP procedures. In these conditions the statistical analysis revealed similar performances in both apheresis devices in PRE (p = ns) but better performances with SPO when considering higher PRE corrected by anticoagulant volume used (p < 0.05). Comparison of secondary outcomes showed no difference after SPO and CSP. After verifying that pre-apheresis patients' coagulation blood levels were identical before SPO and CSP, we showed identical haemostasis disturbances after SPO and CSP but lower platelet losses and higher fibrinogen post-apheresis blood levels after SPO (p < 0.05). No side effects or technical complications occurred during and after SPO and CSP. This study demonstrated that the Spectra Optia device is an alternative device to today's standard, the COBE Spectra device.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation; Performances; Plasma exchange; Spectra Optia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130725     DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci        ISSN: 1473-0502            Impact factor:   1.764


  2 in total

1.  Safety of acoustic separation in plastic devices for extracorporeal blood processing.

Authors:  William J Savage; John R Burns; Jason Fiering
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Therapeutic plasma exchange using the Spectra Optia cell separator compared with the COBE Spectra.

Authors:  Do Kyun Kim; Sinyoung Kim; Seok Hoon Jeong; Hyun Ok Kim; Hyung Jik Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.