Literature DB >> 25130677

Comparison of adenocarcinoma (ACA) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix in a sub-optimally screened cohort: a population-based epidemiologic study of 51,842 women in Brazil.

Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues1, Carlos Gil Ferreira2, Anke Bergmann3, Suzana Sales de Aguiar2, Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most cancers of the uterine cervix are SCC, but the relative and absolute incidence of ACA has risen in recent years, and ACA now accounts for approximately 20% of invasive cervical cancers in the screened populations worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidemiological, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of ACA with those of SCC of the cervix in a sub-optimally screened population.
METHODS: Data from cervical cancer patients with SCC and ACA treated from 2000 through 2009 were obtained from the Brazilian Hospital Cancer Register databases. The summary odds ratios and chi-square tests were estimated.
RESULTS: A total of 51,842 patients including 45,540 (87.8%) cases of SCC and 6302 (12.2%) of ACA were analyzed. Compared with the ACA patients, the SCC patients were younger and more frequently black and had a higher degree of illiteracy and alcohol and tobacco consumers. The tumor stage at the time of diagnosis was also significantly different between the two groups. However, initial therapeutic response and death rate after the first course of treatment were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences between ACA and SCC were observed for all demographic and clinical variables analyzed but not for responses to treatment and death at the end of the first course of treatment. Irrespective of the histological subtype, the quality of screening and treatment must be improved in developing countries, since initial therapeutic response of ACA and SCC is similar.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Brazil; Cervical cancer; Epidemiology; Squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130677     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of novel prognosis-related proteomic signature effectively improve risk stratification and precision treatment for patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Ji; Guangdi Chu; Yulong Chen; Jinwen Jiao; Teng Lv; Qin Yao
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  The value of HPV genotypes combined with clinical indicators in the classification of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zhimin He; Rongsheng Chen; Shangying Hu; Yajiao Zhang; Yang Liu; Chengwei Li; Fajin Lv; Zhibo Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Clinical and MRI Characteristics of Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Its Variants and Mimics.

Authors:  Tsukasa Saida; Akiko Sakata; Yumiko Oishi Tanaka; Hiroyuki Ochi; Toshitaka Ishiguro; Masafumi Sakai; Hiroaki Takahashi; Toyomi Satoh; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Characterization of women with cervical cancer assisted at Inca by histological type.

Authors:  Suelem do Rozario; Iléia Ferreira da Silva; Rosalina Jorge Koifman; Ilce Ferreira da Silva
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Stage and histology of cervical cancer in women under 25 years old.

Authors:  Diama Bhadra Vale; Lucas Almeida Cavalcante; Liliana Aparecida Lucci De Angelo Andrade; Julio Cesar Teixeira; Talita Lourenço do Rio Menin; Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Incidence and risk factors for the development of cerebral metastasis in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Juliana de Brito Rangel; Alessandra Grasso Giglio; Cristiane Lemos Cardozo; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Comparison of survival outcomes between radical hysterectomy and definitive radiochemotherapy in stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Wen-Wen Zhang; Zhen-Yu He; Jia-Yuan Sun; Yan Wang; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.989

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.