Literature DB >> 25130520

Impulsivity, risk-taking, and distractibility in rats exhibiting robust conditioned orienting behaviors.

Megan E Olshavsky1, Jason Shumake, Alek A Rosenthal, Amine Kaddour-Djebbar, F Gonzalez-Lima, Barry Setlow, Hongjoo J Lee.   

Abstract

When a neutral cue is followed by a significant event such as food delivery, some animals become engaged with the cue itself and acquire cue-directed behaviors. One type of cue-directed behavior is observed following insertion of a lever used as a conditioned stimulus (CS). Rats showing robust approach behavior to the lever also display impulsivity and altered attention, as compared to rats showing behavior directed toward the reward delivery location. The current study used a light CS to categorize rats' propensity for cue-directed behavior, and assessed whether individual differences in impulsivity and related behaviors still emerged. During the light-food pairings, some rats displayed enhanced rearing or orienting to the light (Orienters) prior to showing food cup approach behavior, while other rats only showed food cup approach behavior (Nonorienters). Our results showed that Orienters made more impulsive and risky decisions in two different choice tasks, and were quicker to leave a familiar dark environment to enter a novel bright field. Orienters also showed less accurate target detection when a visual distractor was introduced during an attentional challenge. Our current study suggests that light CS-induced rearing/orienting behavior might not necessarily share an identical mechanism with lever CS-approach behavior in predicting impulsivity-related behaviors. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; impulsive choice; nosepoke; orienting; rats; risky choice

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130520     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Extinction to amphetamine-associated context in female rats is dependent upon conditioned orienting.

Authors:  E N Hilz; S M Lewis; S Park; M H Monfils; H J Lee
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Using rodent models to understand interactions between gambling and substance use.

Authors:  Barry Setlow; Shelby L Blaes; Matthew R Burns; R Joseph Dragone; Caitlin A Orsini
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-19

3.  Isolating the incentive salience of reward-associated stimuli: value, choice, and persistence.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Jonathan J Chow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.

Authors:  Allison M Ahrens; Bryan F Singer; Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Risky decision-making predicts dopamine release dynamics in nucleus accumbens shell.

Authors:  Timothy G Freels; Daniel B K Gabriel; Deranda B Lester; Nicholas W Simon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 8.294

6.  Sign tracking predicts suboptimal behavior in a rodent gambling task.

Authors:  Megan Swintosky; James T Brennan; Corrine Koziel; John P Paulus; Sara E Morrison
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.415

7.  Answering hastily retards learning.

Authors:  Yosuke Yawata; Kenichi Makino; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.